Suppr超能文献

羽脂作为喜鹊(Pica pica)羽毛上有机污染物外部污染的主要来源。

Preen oil as the main source of external contamination with organic pollutants onto feathers of the common magpie (Pica pica).

作者信息

Jaspers Veerle L B, Covaci Adrian, Deleu Pieter, Neels Hugo, Eens Marcel

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.

出版信息

Environ Int. 2008 Aug;34(6):741-8. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Jan 31.

Abstract

We investigated the possible sources of contamination with organic pollutants, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), p,p'-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and metabolites, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), in and onto tail feathers of a large songbird, the common magpie (Pica pica). Although feathers are potentially useful as a non-destructive biomonitor for organic pollutants, concentrations may be influenced by external contamination onto the feather surface. In a first approach, a group of magpies was captured after the completion of moult. The third tail feather was pulled out and a blood sample was taken. Most PCBs, DDTs and some PBDEs could be quantified in one single tail feather, indicating that the applicability of feathers goes beyond monitoring with predatory birds, as shown previously. Nevertheless, correlations between levels in serum and feathers were found significant in three cases only (i.e. CB 170, CB 180 and CB 187). This finding may be attributed to different factors, such as varying diet, condition, sample size or external contamination. In a second approach, cadavers of magpies were collected throughout Flanders. The preen gland was removed and the first, third and fifth tail feathers were pulled out at both sides. No significant differences were found among tail feathers within an individual. We compared three washing procedures to remove external contamination with organic pollutants from these feathers: deionised water, acetone and a surfactant/acetone solution. Right feathers were washed and left feathers were kept as control. Concentrations in the resulting washes were found highest in the acetone solutions. Furthermore, feathers washed with acetone or with a surfactant/acetone solution had significantly lower mean concentrations than the control feathers. Highest correlations with levels in preen gland were obtained for the control feathers. Consequently, the source of external contamination with organic pollutants onto feathers seems to be endogenous, originating from the preen gland. This is in great contrast to the extensive airborne pollution that has been reported for most heavy metals. In summary, the results of the current study highlight the usefulness of feathers for non-destructive biomonitoring of organic pollutants.

摘要

我们调查了大型鸣禽喜鹊(Pica pica)尾羽内外有机污染物的可能污染源,这些有机污染物包括多氯联苯(PCBs)、p,p'-二氯二苯三氯乙烷(DDT)及其代谢物,以及多溴二苯醚(PBDEs)。尽管羽毛有可能作为有机污染物的非破坏性生物监测指标,但污染物浓度可能会受到羽毛表面外部污染的影响。在第一种方法中,一组喜鹊在换羽完成后被捕获。拔出第三根尾羽并采集血样。大多数多氯联苯、滴滴涕和一些多溴二苯醚可以在一根尾羽中进行定量,这表明羽毛作为监测指标的适用性超出了此前对猛禽的监测。然而,仅在三个案例中发现血清和羽毛中的污染物水平之间存在显著相关性(即CB 170、CB 180和CB 187)。这一发现可能归因于不同因素,如饮食差异、身体状况、样本量或外部污染。在第二种方法中,在整个佛兰德地区收集喜鹊尸体。取出尾脂腺,并在两侧拔出第一、第三和第五根尾羽。在个体内部,尾羽之间未发现显著差异。我们比较了三种清洗程序,以去除这些羽毛上的有机污染物外部污染:去离子水、丙酮和表面活性剂/丙酮溶液。右侧羽毛进行清洗,左侧羽毛作为对照。结果发现,丙酮溶液中的清洗液浓度最高。此外用丙酮或表面活性剂/丙酮溶液清洗的羽毛平均浓度明显低于对照羽毛。对照羽毛与尾脂腺中的污染物水平相关性最高。因此,羽毛上有机污染物的外部污染源似乎是内源性的,源自尾脂腺。这与大多数重金属所报道的广泛空气传播污染形成了鲜明对比。总之,本研究结果突出了羽毛在有机污染物非破坏性生物监测中的有用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验