Suppr超能文献

儿童保育中心过敏反应的管理:干预项目6个月和12个月后的评估

Management of anaphylaxis in child care centers: evaluation 6 and 12 months after an intervention program.

作者信息

Patel Bina M, Bansal Priya J, Tobin Mary C

机构信息

Department of Allergy and Immunology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612-3824, USA.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Dec;97(6):813-5. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60974-X.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many young children with a history of allergic reactions or anaphylaxis spend considerable time in child care centers. We previously reported that a significant knowledge deficit exists in anaphylaxis recognition, evaluation, and treatment and that greater anaphylaxis education is needed among child care providers.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether child care centers can recognize, evaluate, and treat anaphylactic episodes in children aged 1 to 6 years 6 months and 1 year after attending an allergy seminar.

METHODS

All 39 child care centers participating in the original study were selected to complete 6-month and 1-year follow-up surveys using a similar questionnaire. Those who did not attend the seminar or complete all the previous surveys were excluded.

RESULTS

At 6 months and 1 year, 37 and 29 centers, respectively, completed surveys. There was a significant improvement regarding when to administer intramuscular epinephrine compared with before the allergy seminar. However, only 48% of the centers at 6 months (P = .02) and 31% at 1 year (P = .002) knew how to correctly administer intramuscular epinephrine compared with 77% four weeks after the seminar. With time, there was a significant decline in correctly recognizing typical anaphylaxis symptoms, including abdominal cramping, chest tightness, shortness of breath, low blood pressure, and diarrhea, whereas symptoms such as hives, swelling, and wheezing continued to be identified correctly.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for renewed anaphylaxis education among child care providers. Initially, this intervention significantly increased the ability of child care center staff to recognize, evaluate, and treat anaphylaxis, but knowledge diminished gradually at 6-month and 1-year follow-up.

摘要

背景

许多有过敏反应或过敏症病史的幼儿在日托中心度过相当长的时间。我们之前报告过,在过敏症的识别、评估和治疗方面存在重大的知识缺陷,日托服务提供者需要接受更多的过敏症教育。

目的

确定日托中心在参加过敏症研讨会6个月和1年后,是否能够识别、评估和治疗1至6岁6个月儿童的过敏发作。

方法

选择参与原研究的所有39个日托中心,使用类似的问卷完成6个月和1年的随访调查。未参加研讨会或未完成所有先前调查的被排除。

结果

在6个月和1年时,分别有37个和29个中心完成了调查。与参加过敏症研讨会之前相比,在何时使用肌肉注射肾上腺素方面有显著改善。然而,与研讨会四周后77%的知晓率相比,6个月时只有48%的中心(P = 0.02)、1年时只有31%的中心(P = 0.002)知道如何正确使用肌肉注射肾上腺素。随着时间的推移,正确识别典型过敏症状(包括腹部绞痛、胸闷、呼吸急促、低血压和腹泻)的能力显著下降,而诸如荨麻疹、肿胀和喘息等症状仍能被正确识别。

结论

日托服务提供者需要再次接受过敏症教育。最初,这种干预显著提高了日托中心工作人员识别、评估和治疗过敏症的能力,但在6个月和1年的随访中知识逐渐减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验