Gold M S, Sainsbury R
University Department of Pediatrics, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, Australia.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000 Jul;106(1 Pt 1):171-6. doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.106041.
Epinephrine for first aid use by parents and other caregivers and in the form of an autoinjector device (EpiPen, Center Laboratories) is often prescribed for children who have had previous anaphylactic reactions. It is not known whether the EpiPen device is used appropriately during subsequent reactions and whether its use is able to prevent the complications of anaphylaxis.
Our purpose was to determine parental knowledge and practice concerning first aid anaphylaxis management, the frequency of recurrent generalized allergic reactions, the first aid measures taken, and the subsequent outcome of these reactions.
A retrospective survey was performed with a telephone questionnaire of all children with a history of anaphylaxis who attended a specialist allergy service and were prescribed an EpiPen autoinjector device.
Recurrent generalized allergic reactions occurred with a frequency of 0.98 episodes per patient per year and were more common in those with food compared with insect venom anaphylaxis. The EpiPen device was only used in 29% of recurrent anaphylactic reactions. Parental knowledge was deficient in recognition of the symptoms of anaphylaxis and use of the EpiPen device, and adequate first aid measures were not in place for the majority of children attending school. Those children in whom the EpiPen device was used were less likely to be given epinephrine in hospital and to require subsequent hospital admission.
The EpiPen autoinjector device is infrequently used in children with recurrent episodes of anaphylaxis; the reasons for this require further research. It is likely that parents and other caregivers will require continuing education and support in first aid anaphylaxis management. When the EpiPen device is used appropriately, it appears to reduce subsequent morbidity from anaphylaxis.
肾上腺素通常会被开给有过过敏反应的儿童,供家长和其他护理人员用于急救,并采用自动注射装置(EpiPen,Center Laboratories公司)的形式。尚不清楚EpiPen装置在后续反应中是否得到恰当使用,以及其使用能否预防过敏反应的并发症。
我们的目的是确定家长在急救过敏反应管理方面的知识和实践、复发性全身性过敏反应的发生频率、采取的急救措施以及这些反应的后续结果。
对所有有过敏反应病史、在专科过敏服务机构就诊并被开了EpiPen自动注射装置的儿童进行电话问卷调查,开展回顾性研究。
复发性全身性过敏反应的发生频率为每名患者每年0.98次发作,与昆虫毒液过敏反应相比,食物过敏反应的患者中更为常见。EpiPen装置仅在29%的复发性过敏反应中被使用。家长在识别过敏反应症状和使用EpiPen装置方面知识不足,大多数上学的儿童没有适当的急救措施。使用了EpiPen装置的儿童在医院接受肾上腺素治疗以及随后需要住院的可能性较小。
EpiPen自动注射装置在复发性过敏反应儿童中使用频率较低;其原因需要进一步研究。家长和其他护理人员可能需要在急救过敏反应管理方面接受持续教育和支持。当EpiPen装置得到恰当地使用时,似乎可以降低过敏反应后续的发病率。