Sumskiene Jolanta, Sumskas Linas, Petrauskas Dalius, Kupcinskas Limas
Department of Gastroenterology, Kaunas University of Medicine, A.Mickeviciaus street 9, Kaunas LT-44307, Lithuania.
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec 28;12(48):7792-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i48.7792.
To evaluate disease-specific quality of life (QOL) in liver cirrhosis patients and to compare it with those of a healthy population. Also an important objective was to assess whether QOL in liver cirrhosis patients differs by age and gender, by type and severity of disease.
The case group of 131 liver cirrhosis patients was selected. The control group of 262 was enrolled from a healthy population according to the scheme of case-control study. Clinical, demographic, laboratory data were collected. QOL was measured with a specific chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ), which was translated and validated in Lithuanian. QOL scores were compared between groups by age, gender, type and severity of disease. Cronbach's alpha statistics calculation was used for evaluation of internal consistency reliability. Student's t test or ANOVA were used for evaluation hypothesis about probability equation.
QOL was significantly lower in liver cirrhosis patients than in healthy population (59.5 +/- 18.3 vs 85.3 +/- 12.3, P < 0.001). The significant QOL differences between case and control groups were observed in domains of worry and abdominal symptoms, the smaller differences-in emotional functions and systematic symptom domains. Significantly worse QOL was in observed patients with increased clinical severity of the disease measured by Child-Pugh class. Age, gender and etiology of disease had an insignificant effect on QOL in cirrhotic patients.
QOL was significantly impaired in all CLDQ domains in liver cirrhosis patients. Increase in severity of disease was the major factor associated with poorer QOL.
评估肝硬化患者特定疾病的生活质量(QOL),并与健康人群的生活质量进行比较。另一个重要目标是评估肝硬化患者的生活质量是否因年龄、性别、疾病类型和严重程度而异。
选取131例肝硬化患者作为病例组。根据病例对照研究方案,从健康人群中招募262例作为对照组。收集临床、人口统计学和实验室数据。使用一份特定的慢性肝病问卷(CLDQ)测量生活质量,该问卷已被翻译成立陶宛语并经过验证。按年龄、性别、疾病类型和严重程度比较两组的生活质量得分。使用Cronbach's alpha统计计算评估内部一致性可靠性。使用学生t检验或方差分析评估关于概率方程的假设。
肝硬化患者的生活质量显著低于健康人群(59.5±18.3 vs 85.3±12.3,P<0.001)。病例组和对照组在担忧和腹部症状领域存在显著的生活质量差异,在情感功能和系统症状领域差异较小。根据Child-Pugh分级,疾病临床严重程度增加的患者生活质量明显更差。年龄、性别和疾病病因对肝硬化患者的生活质量影响不显著。
肝硬化患者在所有CLDQ领域的生活质量均显著受损。疾病严重程度增加是生活质量较差的主要相关因素。