通过检测同时采用逆转录聚合酶链反应（RT-PCR）和电子显微镜检查的粪便样本，比较RIDASCREEN诺如病毒酶免疫测定法与IDEIA NLV GI/GII法。
Comparison of the RIDASCREEN norovirus enzyme immunoassay to IDEIA NLV GI/GII by testing stools also assayed by RT-PCR and electron microscopy.
作者信息
Castriciano Santina, Luinstra Kathy, Petrich Astrid, Smieja Marek, Lee Christine, Jang Dan, Portillo Eder, Chernesky Max
机构信息
St. Joseph's Healthcare and The Father Sean O'Sullivan Research Centre, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, ON. L8N 4A6, Canada.
出版信息
J Virol Methods. 2007 May;141(2):216-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.12.001. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
RIDASCREEN norovirus enzyme immunoassay (EIA) detected 80.3% of norovirus-infected feces samples compared to 60.6% by IDEIA NLV GI/GII from 228 patients with no false positives by either assay. RT-PCR and electron microscopy percent sensitivity and specificity were 98.5, 100 and 36.4 and 96.9, respectively.
里达斯克里恩诺如病毒酶免疫测定法（EIA）检测出80.3%的诺如病毒感染粪便样本，相比之下，来自228名患者的粪便样本中，IDEIA NLV GI/GII法的检测率为60.6%，两种检测方法均无假阳性。逆转录聚合酶链反应（RT-PCR）和电子显微镜检查的灵敏度和特异性百分比分别为98.5%、100%以及36.4%、96.9%。
Zotero 插件