Gilder Jason R, Doom Travis E, Inman Keith, Krane Dan E
Forensic Bioinformatics Inc., 2850 Presidential Drive, Suite 150, Fairborn, OH 45324, USA.
J Forensic Sci. 2007 Jan;52(1):97-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00318.x.
STR-based DNA profiling is an exceptionally sensitive analytical technique that is often used to obtain results at the very limits of its sensitivity. The challenge of reliably distinguishing between signal and noise in such situations is one that has been rigorously addressed in numerous other analytical disciplines. However, an inability to determine accurately the height of electropherogram baselines has caused forensic DNA profiling laboratories to utilize alternative approaches. Minimum thresholds established during laboratory validation studies have become the de facto standard for distinguishing between reliable signal and noise/technical artifacts. These minimum peak height thresholds generally fail to consider variability in the sensitivity of instruments, reagents, and the skill of human analysts involved in the DNA profiling process over the course of time. Software (BatchExtract) made publicly available by the National Center for Biotechnology Information now provides an alternative means of establishing limits of detection and quantitation that is more consistent with those used in other analytical disciplines. We have used that software to determine the height of each data collection point for each dye along a control sample's electropherogram trace. These values were then used to determine a limit of detection (the average amount of background noise plus three standard deviations) and a limit of quantitation (the average amount of background noise plus 10 standard deviations) for each control sample. Analyses of the electropherogram data associated with the positive, negative, and reagent blank controls included in 50 different capillary electrophoresis runs validate that this approach could be used to determine run-specific thresholds objectively for use in forensic DNA casework.
基于短串联重复序列(STR)的DNA分型是一种极其灵敏的分析技术,常被用于在其灵敏度极限下获取结果。在这种情况下,可靠地区分信号与噪声的挑战在许多其他分析学科中都得到了严格解决。然而,无法准确确定电泳图谱基线的高度,导致法医DNA分型实验室采用了替代方法。实验室验证研究中确定的最低阈值已成为区分可靠信号与噪声/技术假象的实际标准。这些最低峰高阈值通常没有考虑到在DNA分型过程中,随着时间推移,仪器、试剂的灵敏度以及参与该过程的人类分析人员技能的变化。美国国立生物技术信息中心公开提供的软件(BatchExtract)现在提供了一种确定检测限和定量限的替代方法,这种方法与其他分析学科中使用的方法更为一致。我们使用该软件来确定沿着对照样品电泳图谱轨迹的每种染料的每个数据收集点的高度。然后,这些值被用于确定每个对照样品的检测限(背景噪声的平均值加上三个标准差)和定量限(背景噪声的平均值加上十个标准差)。对50次不同毛细管电泳运行中包含的阳性、阴性和试剂空白对照相关的电泳图谱数据的分析证实,这种方法可用于客观地确定特定运行的阈值,以用于法医DNA案件工作。