Frank Robert
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-6201, USA.
Novartis Found Symp. 2007;278:197-208; discussion 208-21.
Actions that promote fairness are sometimes consistent with the pursuit of individual self-interest, sometimes not. The diner who leaves a generous tip at a favourite local restaurant, for example, may do so partly out of a sense of obligation to the waiter. But we need not invoke fairness to explain the tip, which is, after all, a prudent investment in obtaining good service in the future. In contrast, narrow self-interest cannot explain why travellers might leave tips in restaurants located along interstate highways. Because it is unlikely that they will ever visit these restaurants again, their failure to tip cannot affect the quality of service they expect to receive in the future. So it is hard to escape the conclusion that concerns about fairness must be implicated when diners tip on the road. Of course, merely to assert the existence of a sense of fairness does not really explain why people often set aside concern for narrow self-interest. It simply raises the more fundamental question of why people have a sense of fairness in the first place. It is this question I will discuss.
促进公平的行为有时与追求个人私利相一致,有时则不然。例如,在当地一家喜欢的餐馆留下丰厚小费的食客,这样做可能部分是出于对服务员的责任感。但我们无需用公平来解释这笔小费,毕竟,这是为未来获得优质服务而进行的明智投资。相比之下,狭隘的私利无法解释为什么旅行者会在州际公路沿线的餐馆留下小费。因为他们不太可能再次光顾这些餐馆,所以他们不给小费不会影响他们未来预期得到的服务质量。因此,很难不得出这样的结论:当食客在旅途中给小费时,对公平的关注必然起了作用。当然,仅仅断言公平感的存在并不能真正解释为什么人们常常不顾狭隘的私利。这只是提出了一个更根本的问题,即人们最初为什么会有公平感。这就是我要讨论的问题。