• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提出质疑的患者。

Patients who challenge.

作者信息

Ward Michael, Savulescu Julian

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Dec;20(4):545-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2006.09.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.bpa.2006.09.003
PMID:17219940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7185597/
Abstract

Individuals have different values. They seek to express their individuality even when receiving medical care. It is a part of modern medical practice and respect for patient autonomy to show respect for different values. We give an account of what it means to respect different values and challenging patients in medical practice. Challenging choices are often choices which are perceived by many to be either irrational or against a person's interests, such as engaging in harmful or excessively risky activities. When the medical profession is involved in such choices, the basic medical principle of acting in a person's best interests is challenged. Often doctors refuse to respect controversial choices on paternalistic grounds. We should all respect and facilitate the controversial choices of competent individuals, subject to resource limitations, our own and others well-being and autonomy, and the public interest. But more importantly, sometimes such choices make for a better, more autonomous life. Sometimes, such choices reflect considerations of global well-being or altruism, or idiosyncratic attitudes to risk. Sometimes, they reflect unusual values. However, in some other cases, controversial choices are irrational and are not expressions of our autonomy. Doctors should assist patients to make rational if individual choices. The patient also bears the responsibility for bringing his beliefs to the attention of the clinician.

摘要

个体具有不同的价值观。即使在接受医疗护理时,他们也试图表达自己的个性。尊重不同的价值观是现代医疗实践的一部分,也是对患者自主权的尊重。我们阐述了在医疗实践中尊重不同价值观以及向患者提出质疑意味着什么。具有挑战性的选择通常是许多人认为不合理或违背个人利益的选择,比如从事有害或风险过高的活动。当医疗行业涉及此类选择时,为患者谋求最大利益这一基本医疗原则就受到了挑战。医生常常基于家长式作风拒绝尊重有争议的选择。在资源有限、自身及他人的福祉与自主权以及公共利益的前提下,我们都应该尊重并促成有行为能力的个体做出有争议的选择。但更重要的是,有时此类选择能造就更美好、更自主的生活。有时,此类选择反映了对全球福祉或利他主义的考量,或者对风险的特殊态度。有时,它们反映了不同寻常的价值观。然而,在其他一些情况下,有争议的选择是不合理的,并非我们自主权的体现。医生应协助患者做出合理的个人选择。患者也有责任让临床医生了解自己的信念。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a64c/7185597/1bf1ec98a64c/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a64c/7185597/1bf1ec98a64c/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a64c/7185597/1bf1ec98a64c/fx1.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients who challenge.提出质疑的患者。
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Dec;20(4):545-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2006.09.003.
2
Agency and authenticity: which value grounds patient choice?代理与真实性:哪种价值为患者选择提供依据?
Theor Med Bioeth. 2011 Aug;32(4):217-27. doi: 10.1007/s11017-011-9180-2.
3
Child welfare versus parental autonomy: medical ethics, the law, and faith-based healing.儿童福利与父母自主权:医学伦理、法律与基于信仰的治疗
Theor Med Bioeth. 2004;25(4):265-76. doi: 10.1007/s11017-004-3137-7.
4
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
5
When clinical medicine collides with religion.当临床医学与宗教发生冲突时。
Lancet. 2003 Dec;362 Suppl(Suppl):s28-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15065-9.
6
Respect for rational autonomy.尊重理性自主。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2009 Dec;19(4):339-66. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0301.
7
[Autonomy attitudes in the treatment compliance of a cohort of subjects with continuous psychotropic drug administration].[一组持续接受精神药物治疗的受试者治疗依从性中的自主性态度]
Encephale. 2002 Sep-Oct;28(5 Pt 1):389-96.
8
A reconsideration of home birth in the United States.美国在家分娩的重新审视。
J Clin Ethics. 2013 Fall;24(3):207-14.
9
[Role of the influence of cultural and religious beliefs on medical end-of-life decision-making].[文化和宗教信仰对临终医疗决策的影响作用]
Ther Umsch. 2018 Jul;75(2):112-116. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000975.
10
Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients.合理的非干涉性家长主义:为何医生应该对什么对患者最有利做出判断。
J Med Ethics. 1995 Dec;21(6):327-31. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.6.327.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient choice vs. finite resources.患者选择与有限资源
Anaesthesia. 2005 Nov;60(11):1149. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04410.x.
2
Colloids for vegetarians.适合素食者的胶体
Anaesthesia. 2005 May;60(5):520. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04205.x.
3
Anaesthesia for vegetarians.素食者的麻醉
Anaesthesia. 2005 May;60(5):520-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04206.x.
4
Use of animal products in vegetarians and others.素食者及其他人对动物产品的使用。
Anaesthesia. 2005 May;60(5):519-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04204.x.
5
Vegetarian anaesthesia.素食者的麻醉
Anaesthesia. 2003 May;58(5):501. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03154_26.x.
6
An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy.一种奥威尔式的情景:法庭下令的剖宫产与女性自主权。
Nurs Ethics. 1999 Nov;6(6):494-505. doi: 10.1177/096973309900600605.
7
Surgeon amputated healthy legs.外科医生截肢了健康的双腿。
BMJ. 2000 Feb 5;320(7231):332.
8
Should informed consent be based on rational beliefs?知情同意应该基于理性信念吗?
J Med Ethics. 1997 Oct;23(5):282-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.5.282.
9
Women, forced caesareans and antenatal responsibilities.女性、强制剖宫产与产前责任
J Med Ethics. 1996 Dec;22(6):327-33. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.6.327.
10
Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients.合理的非干涉性家长主义:为何医生应该对什么对患者最有利做出判断。
J Med Ethics. 1995 Dec;21(6):327-31. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.6.327.