• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知情同意应该基于理性信念吗?

Should informed consent be based on rational beliefs?

作者信息

Savulescu J, Momeyer R W

机构信息

Green College, Oxford, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1997 Oct;23(5):282-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.5.282.

DOI:10.1136/jme.23.5.282
PMID:9358347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1377366/
Abstract

Our aim is to expand the regulative ideal governing consent. We argue that consent should not only be informed but also based on rational beliefs. We argue that holding true beliefs promotes autonomy. Information is important insofar as it helps a person to hold the relevant true beliefs. But in order to hold the relevant true beliefs, competent people must also think rationally. Insofar as information is important, rational deliberation is important. Just as physicians should aim to provide relevant information regarding the medical procedures prior to patients consenting to have those procedures, they should also assist patients to think more rationally. We distinguish between rational choice/action and rational belief. While autonomous choice need not necessarily be rational, it should be based on rational belief. The implication for the doctrine of informed consent and the practice of medicine is that, if physicians are to respect patient autonomy and help patients to choose and act more rationally, not only must they provide information, but they should care more about the theoretical rationality of their patients. They should not abandon their patients to irrationality. They should help their patients to deliberate more effectively and to care more about thinking rationally. We illustrate these arguments in the context of Jehovah's Witnesses refusing life-saving blood transfusions. Insofar as Jehovah's Witnesses should be informed of the consequences of their actions, they should also deliberate rationally about these consequences.

摘要

我们的目标是拓展关于同意的规范性理念。我们认为,同意不仅应基于充分信息,还应基于理性信念。我们认为持有真实信念能促进自主性。信息之所以重要,是因为它有助于一个人持有相关真实信念。但为了持有相关真实信念,有行为能力的人还必须进行理性思考。就信息很重要而言,理性思考也很重要。正如医生在患者同意进行医疗程序之前,应旨在提供有关这些程序的相关信息一样,他们还应协助患者更理性地思考。我们区分理性选择/行动和理性信念。虽然自主选择不一定是理性的,但它应基于理性信念。这对知情同意原则和医学实践的启示是,如果医生要尊重患者的自主性并帮助患者更理性地选择和行动,他们不仅必须提供信息,还应更关注患者的理论理性。他们不应任由患者陷入非理性状态。他们应帮助患者更有效地思考,并更注重理性思考。我们在耶和华见证者拒绝接受救命输血的背景下阐述这些论点。就耶和华见证者应了解其行为的后果而言,他们也应理性思考这些后果。

相似文献

1
Should informed consent be based on rational beliefs?知情同意应该基于理性信念吗?
J Med Ethics. 1997 Oct;23(5):282-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.5.282.
2
Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 2. A novel approach based on rational non-interventional paternalism.耶和华见证人的拒血行为的生物伦理学:第二部分。基于理性非干预家长主义的新方法。
J Med Ethics. 1998 Oct;24(5):295-301. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.5.295.
3
Ethical considerations in blood transfusions: informed consent and religious refusal.输血中的伦理考量:知情同意与宗教拒斥
Spine (Phila Pa 1986). 1991 Jan;5(1):7-15.
4
Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions.耶和华见证人及其自主权:尊重拒绝输血。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Nov;38(11):652-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100802. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
5
Jehovah's Witnesses' refusal of blood: obedience to scripture and religious conscience.耶和华见证会对输血的拒绝:对经文和宗教良知的遵从。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Dec;25(6):469-72. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.6.469.
6
Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 3. A proposal for a don't-ask-don't-tell policy.耶和华见证人的拒输血生物伦理学:第三部分。关于“不问不说”政策的提议。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Dec;25(6):463-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.6.463.
7
Blood transfusions and Jehovah's Witnesses. The impact of the patient's unusual beliefs in critical care.输血与耶和华见证会信徒。患者的特殊信仰对重症监护的影响。
Crit Care Clin. 1986 Jan;2(1):91-100.
8
Recent developments in medical care of Jehovah's Witnesses.耶和华见证人的医疗护理近期进展。
West J Med. 1999 May;170(5):297-301.
9
Their life is in the blood: Jehovah's Witnesses, blood transfusions and the courts.他们的生命维系于血液:耶和华见证人、输血与法庭。
North KY Law Rev. 1983;10(2):281-304.
10
A justification for medical procedures performed without consent.未经同意实施医疗程序的正当理由。
Law Q Rev. 1974 Oct;90(360):512-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Between Autonomy and Paternalism: Attitudes of Nursing Personnel Towards Jehovah's Witnesses' Refusal of Blood Transfusion.在自主与家长主义之间:护理人员对耶和华见证人拒绝输血的态度。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Aug 3;68:1606291. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606291. eCollection 2023.
2
Moving from 'fully' to 'appropriately' informed consent in genomics: The PROMICE framework.从“完全”知情同意到“适当”知情同意在基因组学中的转变:PROMICE 框架。
Bioethics. 2022 Jul;36(6):655-665. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13027. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
3
Old Challenges or New Issues? Genetic Health Professionals' Experiences Obtaining Informed Consent in Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing.旧挑战还是新问题?遗传健康专业人员在诊断性基因组测序中获得知情同意的经验。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):12-23. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1823906. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
4
Authority and the Future of Consent in Population-Level Biomedical Research.群体层面生物医学研究中的同意权与未来
Public Health Ethics. 2019 Oct 30;12(3):225-236. doi: 10.1093/phe/phz015. eCollection 2019 Nov.
5
Solidarity and Responsibility in Health Care.医疗保健中的团结与责任。
Public Health Ethics. 2019 Jul 4;12(2):133-144. doi: 10.1093/phe/phz008. eCollection 2019 Jul.
6
The notion of free will and its ethical relevance for decision-making capacity.自由意志的概念及其对决策能力的伦理相关性。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 May 8;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0371-0.
7
The Right to Know: A Revised Standard for Reporting Incidental Findings.知情同意权:偶然发现报告的修订标准。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Mar;48(2):22-32. doi: 10.1002/hast.836.
8
Autonomy, Competence and Non-interference.自主性、能力与不干涉。
HEC Forum. 2018 Sep;30(3):235-252. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9344-1.
9
Major abdominal surgery in Jehovah's Witnesses.耶和华见证人的腹部大手术。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Nov;98(8):532-537. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0210. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
10
The Ethics of Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa.用于治疗神经性厌食症的脑深部电刺激的伦理问题
Neuroethics. 2015;8(3):215-230. doi: 10.1007/s12152-015-9240-9. Epub 2015 Sep 24.