Friis Anne Kirketerp, Kofoed Julie L L, Heron Gorm, Albrechtsen Hans-Jørgen, Bjerg Poul L
Institute of Environment & Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Building 115, Bygningstorvet, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Biodegradation. 2007 Dec;18(6):661-74. doi: 10.1007/s10532-006-9098-y. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
This paper investigates effects of combining thermal and biological remediation, based on laboratory studies of trichloroethene (TCE) degradation. Aquifer material was collected 6 months after terminating a full-scale Electrical Resistance Heating (ERH), when the site had cooled from approximately 100 degrees C to 40 degrees C. The aquifer material was used to construct bioaugmented microcosms amended with the mixed anaerobic dechlorinating culture, KB-1(TM), and an electron donor (5 mM lactate). Microcosms were bioaugmented during cooling at 40, 30, 20, and 10 degrees C, as temperatures continually decreased during laboratory incubation. Redox conditions were generally methanogenic, and electron donors were present to support dechlorination. For microcosms bioaugmented at 10 degrees C and 20 degrees C, dechlorination stalled at cis-dichloroethene (cDCE) and vinyl chloride (VC) 150 days after bioaugmentation. However, within 300 days of incubation ethene was produced in the majority of these microcosms. In contrast, dechlorination was rapid and complete in microcosms bioaugmented at 30 degrees C. Microcosms bioaugmented at 40 degrees C also showed rapid dechlorination, but stalled at cDCE with partial VC and ethene production, even after 150 days of incubation when the temperature had decreased to 10 degrees C. These results suggest that sequential bioremediation of TCE is possible in field-scale thermal treatments after donor addition and bioaugmentation and that the optimal bioaugmentation temperature is approximately 30 degrees C. When biological and thermal remediations are to be applied at the same location, three bioremediation approaches could be considered: (a) treating TCE in perimeter areas outside the source zone at temperatures of approximately 30 degrees C; (b) polishing TCE concentrations in the original source zone during cooling from approximately 30 degrees C to ambient groundwater temperatures; and (c) using bioremediation in downgradient areas taking advantages of the higher temperature and potential release of organic matter.
本文基于三氯乙烯(TCE)降解的实验室研究,探讨了热修复与生物修复相结合的效果。在全尺寸电阻加热(ERH)结束6个月后采集含水层材料,此时场地温度已从约100摄氏度冷却至40摄氏度。该含水层材料用于构建添加了混合厌氧脱氯培养物KB - 1(TM)和电子供体(5 mM乳酸盐)的生物强化微观模型。在实验室培养期间温度持续下降时,微观模型在40、30、20和10摄氏度冷却过程中进行生物强化。氧化还原条件一般为产甲烷条件,且存在电子供体以支持脱氯作用。对于在10摄氏度和20摄氏度进行生物强化的微观模型,生物强化150天后脱氯作用在顺式二氯乙烯(cDCE)和氯乙烯(VC)阶段停滞。然而,在培养300天内,这些微观模型中的大多数产生了乙烯。相比之下,在30摄氏度进行生物强化的微观模型中脱氯迅速且完全。在40摄氏度进行生物强化的微观模型也显示出快速脱氯,但在cDCE阶段停滞,仅产生部分VC和乙烯,即使在培养150天后温度已降至10摄氏度时也是如此。这些结果表明,在添加供体和进行生物强化后,现场规模的热处理中TCE的顺序生物修复是可行的,且最佳生物强化温度约为30摄氏度。当在同一地点应用生物修复和热修复时,可以考虑三种生物修复方法:(a) 在源区外围区域约30摄氏度的温度下处理TCE;(b) 在从约30摄氏度冷却至环境地下水温度的过程中,对原始源区的TCE浓度进行精处理;(c) 利用下游区域较高的温度和有机物的潜在释放进行生物修复。