Starman James S, Vanbeek Corinne, Armfield Derek R, Sahasrabudhe Amit, Baker Champ L, Irrgang James J, Fu Freddie H
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Center for Sports Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 May;15(5):493-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0266-8. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
Anatomical studies show that the native ACL consists of two distinct functional bundles, termed the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles. The utility of using routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to distinguish the individual bundles of the ACL has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer agreement for assessment of the AM and PL bundles using MRI in the axial, coronal, and sagittal viewing planes. We identified a series of patients seen in the senior author's clinic during a 16-month period. Images were independently evaluated in blinded fashion at two separate time points by a musculoskeletal radiologist and two orthopaedic residents. The AM bundle was detected in most planes of view with high frequency and reliability, while detection of the PL bundle was less frequent and had a lower associated reliability. Our results indicate that it is difficult to reliably detect both the AM and PL bundles using a low-field strength magnet with standard planes of view. It has been demonstrated that the ACL may be imaged effectively in planes that are based on the natural course of the ligament, and it is likely that this will also facilitate visualization of the individual AM and PL bundles. The use of additional oblique planes of view offers a potential approach for improved evaluation of the ACL, even with low field strength magnets. Future work in this area may assist in the pre-operative assessment of isolated AM or PL bundle injuries, facilitating a more anatomic approach to ACL reconstruction.
解剖学研究表明,天然前交叉韧带(ACL)由两个不同的功能束组成,即前内侧(AM)束和后外侧(PL)束。使用常规磁共振成像(MRI)区分ACL各束的实用性尚未得到评估。本研究的目的是评估在轴向、冠状和矢状位观察平面上使用MRI评估AM束和PL束时观察者内和观察者间的一致性。我们确定了在16个月期间在资深作者诊所就诊的一系列患者。图像由一名肌肉骨骼放射科医生和两名骨科住院医师在两个不同时间点以盲法独立评估。AM束在大多数观察平面上被高频且可靠地检测到,而PL束的检测频率较低且相关可靠性较低。我们的结果表明,使用低场强磁体和标准观察平面难以可靠地检测到AM束和PL束。已经证明,基于韧带自然走行的平面可以有效地对ACL进行成像,并且这也可能有助于观察AM束和PL束的个体情况。即使使用低场强磁体,使用额外的斜位观察平面也为改进ACL评估提供了一种潜在方法。该领域未来的工作可能有助于孤立的AM束或PL束损伤的术前评估,促进对ACL重建采用更符合解剖学的方法。