Wagner Anita K, Ross-Degnan Dennis, Gurwitz Jerry H, Zhang Fang, Gilden Daniel B, Cosler Leon, Soumerai Stephen B
Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jan 16;146(2):96-103. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-2-200701160-00004.
Medicare Part D excludes benzodiazepines from coverage, and numerous state government policies limit use of benzodiazepines. No data indicate that such policies have decreased the incidence of hip fracture.
To assess whether a statewide policy that decreased the use of benzodiazepines among elderly persons by more than 50% has decreased the incidence of hip fracture.
A quasi-experiment comparing changes in outcomes before and after a policy change in a study U.S. state (New York) and a control state (New Jersey).
Two U.S. state Medicaid programs, 1988-1990.
Medicaid enrollees in New York (n = 51 529) and New Jersey (n = 42 029) who received or did not receive a benzodiazepine.
Benzodiazepine prescribing and hazard ratios for hip fracture, adjusted for age and eligibility category.
A statewide policy, implemented in New York in 1989, that required triplicate forms for benzodiazepine prescribing to allow surveillance by health authorities.
The triplicate prescription policy immediately resulted in a 60.3% (95% CI, -66.3% to -54.2%) reduction in benzodiazepine use among women and 58.5% (-64.3% to -52.8%) among men. Benzodiazepine use in New Jersey remained stable. Hazard ratios for hip fracture that were adjusted for age and eligibility category did not change in New York or New Jersey when the periods before and after use of the triplicate prescription policy were compared (change from 1.2 to 1.1 among female benzodiazepine recipients [P = 0.70], 1.3 to 1.1 [P = 0.08] among female nonrecipients, 0.8 to 1.1 [P = 0.56] among male recipients, and 1.1 to 1.3 [P = 0.46] among male nonrecipients).
Information was lacking on race, benzodiazepine dose, and other potential determinants of continued benzodiazepine prescribing.
Policies that lead to substantial reductions in the use of benzodiazepines among elderly persons do not necessarily lead to decreased incidence of hip fracture. Limitations on coverage of benzodiazepines under Medicare Part D may not achieve this widely assumed clinical benefit.
医疗保险D部分将苯二氮䓬类药物排除在承保范围之外,许多州政府政策也限制苯二氮䓬类药物的使用。没有数据表明此类政策降低了髋部骨折的发生率。
评估一项使老年人苯二氮䓬类药物使用量减少超过50%的全州政策是否降低了髋部骨折的发生率。
一项准实验,比较美国一个研究州(纽约州)和一个对照州(新泽西州)政策变化前后的结果变化。
两个美国州的医疗补助计划,1988 - 1990年。
纽约州(n = 51529)和新泽西州(n = 42029)接受或未接受苯二氮䓬类药物治疗的医疗补助计划参保者。
苯二氮䓬类药物的处方量以及髋部骨折的风险比,并根据年龄和资格类别进行调整。
1989年在纽约州实施的一项全州政策,该政策要求开具苯二氮䓬类药物处方需使用三联处方,以便卫生当局进行监督。
三联处方政策立即导致女性苯二氮䓬类药物使用量减少60.3%(95%CI,-66.3%至-54.2%),男性减少58.5%(-64.3%至-52.8%)。新泽西州的苯二氮䓬类药物使用量保持稳定。在比较三联处方政策使用前后的时间段时,纽约州和新泽西州经年龄和资格类别调整后的髋部骨折风险比没有变化(女性苯二氮䓬类药物接受者从1.2变为1.1 [P = 0.70],女性非接受者从1.3变为1.1 [P = 0.08],男性接受者从0.8变为1.1 [P = 0.56],男性非接受者从1.1变为1.3 [P = 0.46])。
缺乏关于种族、苯二氮䓬类药物剂量以及继续开具苯二氮䓬类药物处方的其他潜在决定因素的信息。
导致老年人苯二氮䓬类药物使用量大幅减少的政策不一定会降低髋部骨折的发生率。医疗保险D部分对苯二氮䓬类药物承保范围的限制可能无法实现这种广泛认为的临床益处。