• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项积极的衣原体筛查计划的医疗保健和患者成本:衣原体筛查研究项目

Healthcare and patient costs of a proactive chlamydia screening programme: the Chlamydia Screening Studies project.

作者信息

Robinson Suzanne, Roberts Tracy, Barton Pelham, Bryan Stirling, Macleod John, McCarthy Anne, Egger Matthias, Sanford Emma, Low Nicola

机构信息

Health Economics Facility, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, 40 Edgbaston Park Road, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Jul;83(4):276-81. doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.023374. Epub 2007 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1136/sti.2006.023374
PMID:17229792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2598691/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Most economic evaluations of chlamydia screening do not include costs incurred by patients. The objective of this study was to estimate both the health service and private costs of patients who participated in proactive chlamydia screening, using mailed home-collected specimens as part of the Chlamydia Screening Studies project.

METHODS

Data were collected on the administrative costs of the screening study, laboratory time and motion studies and patient-cost questionnaire surveys were conducted. The cost for each screening invitation and for each accepted offer was estimated. One-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore the effects of variations in patient costs and the number of patients accepting the screening offer.

RESULTS

The time and costs of processing urine specimens and vulvo-vaginal swabs from women using two nucleic acid amplification tests were similar. The total cost per screening invitation was 20.37 pounds (95% CI 18.94 pounds to 24.83). This included the National Health Service cost per individual screening invitation 13.55 pounds (95% CI 13.15 pounds to 14.33) and average patient costs of 6.82 pounds (95% CI 5.48 pounds to 10.22). Administrative costs accounted for 50% of the overall cost.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost of proactive chlamydia screening is comparable to those of opportunistic screening. Results from this study, which is the first to collect private patient costs associated with a chlamydia screening programme, could be used to inform future policy recommendations and provide unique primary cost data for economic evaluations.

摘要

背景与目的

大多数衣原体筛查的经济评估未纳入患者所产生的费用。本研究的目的是估算参与主动衣原体筛查患者的医疗服务成本和私人成本,该筛查采用邮寄家庭采集标本的方式,作为衣原体筛查研究项目的一部分。

方法

收集了筛查研究的管理成本数据,进行了实验室时间与动作研究,并开展了患者成本问卷调查。估算了每次筛查邀请和每次接受筛查邀请的成本。进行了单向敏感性分析,以探讨患者成本变化和接受筛查邀请的患者数量的影响。

结果

使用两种核酸扩增检测方法处理女性尿液标本和外阴 - 阴道拭子的时间和成本相似。每次筛查邀请的总成本为20.37英镑(95%置信区间为18.94英镑至24.83英镑)。这包括国民医疗服务体系每次个体筛查邀请的成本13.55英镑(95%置信区间为13.15英镑至14.33英镑)以及患者平均成本6.82英镑(95%置信区间为5.48英镑至10.22英镑)。管理成本占总成本的50%。

结论

主动衣原体筛查的成本与机会性筛查的成本相当。本研究首次收集了与衣原体筛查项目相关的患者私人成本,研究结果可用于为未来的政策建议提供参考,并为经济评估提供独特的原始成本数据。

相似文献

1
Healthcare and patient costs of a proactive chlamydia screening programme: the Chlamydia Screening Studies project.一项积极的衣原体筛查计划的医疗保健和患者成本:衣原体筛查研究项目
Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Jul;83(4):276-81. doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.023374. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
2
Modelling the healthcare costs of an opportunistic chlamydia screening programme.对衣原体机会性筛查项目的医疗成本进行建模。
Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Oct;80(5):363-70. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.009654.
3
Epidemiological, social, diagnostic and economic evaluation of population screening for genital chlamydial infection.人群沙眼衣原体感染筛查的流行病学、社会、诊断及经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(8):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-165. doi: 10.3310/hta11080.
4
An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.对英国苏格兰产前、堕胎、阴道镜检查及计划生育诊所就诊女性进行沙眼衣原体感染筛查的经济学评估及可接受性评估。
BJOG. 2004 Nov;111(11):1261-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00324.x.
5
The cost and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Ireland.爱尔兰机会性沙眼衣原体筛查的成本及成本效益。
Sex Transm Infect. 2012 Apr;88(3):222-8. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050067. Epub 2012 Jan 2.
6
Population-based and opportunistic screening and eradication of Helicobacter pylori. An analysis using trial baseline data. Leeds H. pylori Study Group.基于人群和机会性的幽门螺杆菌筛查与根除。一项使用试验基线数据的分析。利兹幽门螺杆菌研究小组。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Fall;15(4):649-60.
7
Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening.在英格兰建立全国衣原体筛查计划:首个完整筛查年度的结果
Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Oct;80(5):335-41. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.012856.
8
Estimation of the burden of disease and costs of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Canada.加拿大生殖道沙眼衣原体感染疾病负担和成本的估算。
Sex Transm Dis. 2012 Apr;39(4):260-7. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31824717ae.
9
[Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].[阿姆斯特丹性活跃人群沙眼衣原体生殖器感染的机会性筛查。II. 女性筛查的成本效益分析]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Mar 27;143(13):677-81.
10
Modelling the impact of opportunistic screening on the sequelae and public healthcare costs of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in Australian women.模拟机会性筛查对澳大利亚女性沙眼衣原体感染后遗症及公共医疗成本的影响。
Public Health. 2006 Jan;120(1):42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.03.002. Epub 2005 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring why a complex intervention piloted in general practices did not result in an increase in chlamydia screening and diagnosis: a qualitative evaluation using the fidelity of implementation model.探究在全科医疗中试行的一项复杂干预措施为何未导致衣原体筛查和诊断率上升:一项基于实施保真度模型的定性评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 21;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0618-0.
2
A time-and-motion approach to micro-costing of high-throughput genomic assays.一种用于高通量基因组检测微观成本核算的时间与动作研究方法。
Curr Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(5):304-313. doi: 10.3747/co.23.2987. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
3
A microcosting study of immunogenicity and tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor drug level tests for therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice.一项关于免疫原性及肿瘤坏死因子α抑制剂药物水平检测用于临床实践中治疗药物监测的微观成本分析研究。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Dec;55(12):2131-2137. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew292. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
4
Exploring the costs and outcomes of sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening interventions targeting men in football club settings: preliminary cost-consequence analysis of the SPORTSMART pilot randomised controlled trial.探索针对足球俱乐部环境中男性的性传播感染(STI)筛查干预措施的成本和结果:SPORTSMART试点随机对照试验的初步成本-后果分析
Sex Transm Infect. 2015 Mar;91(2):100-5. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051715. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
5
Vouchers versus Lotteries: What works best in promoting Chlamydia screening? A cluster randomised controlled trial.代金券与抽奖:在促进衣原体筛查方面哪种方法效果最佳?一项整群随机对照试验。
Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2014 Mar 1;36(1):109-124. doi: 10.1093/aepp/ppt033.
6
Microcosting quantity data collection methods.微观成本核算数量数据收集方法。
Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7 Suppl 1):S76-81. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819bc064.
7
Focus on Chlamydia.关注衣原体。
Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Jul;83(4):251-2. doi: 10.1136/sti.2007.026898.
8
Cost effectiveness of home based population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in the UK: economic evaluation of chlamydia screening studies (ClaSS) project.英国基于家庭的沙眼衣原体人群筛查的成本效益:衣原体筛查研究(ClaSS)项目的经济评估
BMJ. 2007 Aug 11;335(7614):291. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39262.683345.AE. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
9
The cost effectiveness of opportunistic chlamydia screening in England.英格兰衣原体机会性筛查的成本效益
Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Jul;83(4):267-74; discussion 274-5. doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.024364.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiological, social, diagnostic and economic evaluation of population screening for genital chlamydial infection.人群沙眼衣原体感染筛查的流行病学、社会、诊断及经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(8):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-165. doi: 10.3310/hta11080.
2
Partner notification of chlamydia infection in primary care: randomised controlled trial and analysis of resource use.基层医疗中衣原体感染的性伴侣通知:随机对照试验及资源利用分析
BMJ. 2006 Jan 7;332(7532):14-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38678.405370.7C. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
3
Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study.英国普通人群中沙眼衣原体系统性邮政筛查的覆盖率、接受率及感染患病率:横断面研究
BMJ. 2005 Apr 23;330(7497):940. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38413.663137.8F. Epub 2005 Apr 4.
4
Modelling the healthcare costs of an opportunistic chlamydia screening programme.对衣原体机会性筛查项目的医疗成本进行建模。
Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Oct;80(5):363-70. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.009654.
5
The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design.衣原体筛查研究:基本原理与设计
Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Oct;80(5):342-8. doi: 10.1136/sti.2003.006197.
6
Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening.在英格兰建立全国衣原体筛查计划:首个完整筛查年度的结果
Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Oct;80(5):335-41. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.012856.
7
Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. II: prevalence among healthcare attenders, outcome, and evaluation of positive cases.生殖器衣原体感染的机会性筛查。II:医疗机构就诊者中的患病率、结果及阳性病例评估。
Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Feb;79(1):22-7. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.1.22.
8
Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies.沙眼衣原体筛查的成本效益:已发表研究综述
Sex Transm Infect. 2002 Dec;78(6):406-12. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.6.406.
9
British National Health Service's and women's costs of antenatal ultrasound screening and follow-up tests.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Aug;20(2):154-62. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00724.x.
10
Cost effectiveness analysis of a population based screening programme for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women by means of home obtained urine specimens.通过家庭采集尿液样本对女性无症状沙眼衣原体感染进行人群筛查计划的成本效益分析。
Sex Transm Infect. 2001 Aug;77(4):276-82. doi: 10.1136/sti.77.4.276.