Guevremont Lisa, Norton Jonathan A, Mushahwar Vivian K
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Centre for Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Mar;97(3):2499-510. doi: 10.1152/jn.01177.2006. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
The physiological control of stepping is governed both by signals descending from supraspinal systems and by circuitry residing within the lumbosacral spinal cord. The goal of this study was to evaluate the capacity of physiologically based controllers to restore functional overground locomotion after neurological damage, such as spinal cord injury when used in conjunction with functional electrical stimulation. For this purpose we implemented and tested two controllers: 1) an intrinsically timed system that generated a predetermined rhythmic output and 2) a sensory-based system that used feedback signals to make appropriate transitions between the unloaded (flexion) and loaded (extension) phases of the gait cycle. A third controller, a combination of the intrinsically timed and sensory-driven controllers, was implemented and two sessions were conducted to demonstrate the functional advantages of this approach. The controllers were tested in anesthetized cats, implanted with intramuscular electrodes in six major extensor and flexor muscles of the hindlimbs. The cats were partially supported on a sliding trolley that was propelled by the hindlimbs along a 2.5-m instrumented walkway. Ground reaction forces and limb positions were measured by force plates in the walkway and by accelerometers secured to the legs of the cat, respectively. The controllers were used to generate patterns of stimulation that would elicit alternating flexor (swing) and extensor (stance) movements in the hindlimbs. Using either the intrinsically timed or sensory-driven controllers, the cats were able to travel a distance of 2.5 m, taking five to 12 steps. Functional stepping sequences were more easily achieved using the intrinsically timed controller as the result of a lower sensitivity to the selection of initial stimulation parameters. However, unlike the sensory-driven controller, the intrinsically timed controller was unable to adjust to overcome walkway resistance and muscle fatigue. Neither system was consistently able to ensure load-bearing stepping. Therefore we propose the use of a "combined controller" that relies heavily on intrinsic timing but that can be reset based on sensory signals. A combined controller such as this one may provide the best solution for restoring robust overground locomotion after spinal cord injury.
行走的生理控制既受来自脊髓上系统的下行信号支配,也受腰骶脊髓内的神经回路控制。本研究的目的是评估基于生理的控制器在与功能性电刺激联合使用时,恢复神经损伤(如脊髓损伤)后功能性地面行走的能力。为此,我们设计并测试了两种控制器:1)一种内在定时系统,它产生预定的节律性输出;2)一种基于感觉的系统,它使用反馈信号在步态周期的空载(屈曲)和负载(伸展)阶段之间进行适当转换。实施了第三种控制器,即内在定时和感觉驱动控制器的组合,并进行了两个实验环节以证明这种方法的功能优势。这些控制器在麻醉的猫身上进行测试,在后肢的六块主要伸肌和屈肌中植入了肌内电极。猫被部分支撑在一个滑动小车上,该小车由后肢沿着一条2.5米长的仪器化走道推动。地面反作用力和肢体位置分别通过走道中的力板和固定在猫腿上的加速度计进行测量。这些控制器用于产生刺激模式,以引发后肢交替的屈肌(摆动)和伸肌(站立)运动。使用内在定时或感觉驱动控制器时,猫能够行走2.5米的距离,迈出五到十二步。由于对初始刺激参数的选择敏感性较低,使用内在定时控制器更容易实现功能性行走序列。然而,与感觉驱动控制器不同,内在定时控制器无法调整以克服走道阻力和肌肉疲劳。这两种系统都不能始终确保承重行走。因此,我们建议使用一种“组合控制器”,它严重依赖内在定时,但可以根据感觉信号进行重置。这样的组合控制器可能为脊髓损伤后恢复稳健的地面行走提供最佳解决方案。