Suppr超能文献

用于评估组织对漱口水耐受性的腹膜外植体试验。

The peritoneal explant test for evaluating tissue tolerance to mouthrinses.

作者信息

Welk A, Rosin M, Lüdtke C, Schwahn C, Kramer A, Daeschlein G

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology, and Paediatric Dentistry, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2007;20(3):162-6. doi: 10.1159/000098703. Epub 2007 Jan 17.

Abstract

The tissue cultures of explants of neonatal rat peritoneum have been demonstrated to be a sensitive test for tissue compatibility with wound antiseptics. The present study investigated the suitability of this method to assess the relative toxicity of mouthrinses to tissue. Mouthrinses containing 0.1% chlorhexidine (Chlorhexamed Fluid 0.1%) (A), 0.3% triclosan (Colgate) (B), essential oil in ethanolic solution (Listerine) (C), and amine/stannous fluoride (Meridol) (D) were tested at use concentration and in dilutions of 10, 1, and 0.1% with exposure times of 1, 10, and 30 min, respectively. The mouthrinses (test) and Ringer's solutions (control) were applied to opened rat peritoneum. After thorough irrigation with Ringer's solution, a piece of peritoneum was removed and 1 x 1 mm explants were cut. The explants were cultivated with a bovine serum culture medium in 24-well plates at 37 degrees C in a CO2 incubator (95% air, 5% CO2). After 10 days, the tissue proliferation for the explants was assessed by a stereo microscope at 10x magnification after ethanol fixing and hemalaun staining. With 24 grafts per test, the proliferation rate was calculated relative to a control, which was run for each mouthrinse and concentration/time combination. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (SPSS 11.0) and post-hoc paired t test. Statistical significance of all correlations was tested by setting the significance level at p < 0.05. At most concentrations, D caused significantly less tissue damage than A or B. There was no difference between C and A or C and B at 100%. However, the toxicity of C was significantly less than A or B at 10, 1, and 0.1%. C and D behaved similarly except for the 10% (30 min) and the 1% (10 min) solutions in which C was significantly less toxic. We concluded that the rat peritoneum explant test was demonstrated to be a sensitive test to assess the relative toxicity of mouthrinses to tissue.

摘要

新生大鼠腹膜外植体的组织培养已被证明是一种检测伤口消毒剂组织相容性的敏感试验。本研究调查了该方法评估含漱液对组织相对毒性的适用性。对含0.1%氯己定(0.1%洗必泰液)(A)、0.3%三氯生(高露洁)(B)、乙醇溶液中的精油(李施德林)(C)和胺/氟化亚锡(美诺多)(D)的含漱液,分别在使用浓度以及10%、1%和0.1%的稀释度下进行测试,暴露时间分别为1分钟、10分钟和30分钟。将含漱液(试验组)和林格氏液(对照组)应用于打开的大鼠腹膜。用林格氏液彻底冲洗后,取出一块腹膜并切成1×1毫米的外植体。将外植体在含牛血清的培养基中,于37℃的二氧化碳培养箱(95%空气,5%二氧化碳)中,在24孔板中培养。10天后,在乙醇固定和苏木精染色后,用立体显微镜以10倍放大倍数评估外植体的组织增殖情况。每次试验有24个移植物,相对于每个含漱液和浓度/时间组合的对照组计算增殖率。使用方差分析(SPSS 11.0)和事后配对t检验分析数据。通过将显著性水平设定为p<0.05来检验所有相关性的统计学显著性。在大多数浓度下,D造成的组织损伤明显小于A或B。在100%浓度时,C与A或C与B之间没有差异。然而,在10%、1%和0.1%浓度时,C的毒性明显小于A或B。C和D的表现相似,除了10%(30分钟)和1%(10分钟)的溶液,其中C的毒性明显较小。我们得出结论,大鼠腹膜外植体试验被证明是一种评估含漱液对组织相对毒性的敏感试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验