Gözüm Sebahat, Arikan Duygu, Büyükavci Mustafa
Atatürk University School of Nursing, Yakutiye Hospital, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Cancer Nurs. 2007 Jan-Feb;30(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200701000-00007.
The use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) among children with cancer is becoming increasingly popular. Therefore, it is important to gain insight into the prevalence and factors related to the use of CAM. This study presents findings from a study of parents of 88 children with cancer who were receiving or had received conventional therapy for treatment of childhood cancer at a pediatric oncology unit in eastern Turkey. The findings indicated that 48.9% of the respondents reported the use of 1 or more CAM therapies. The most commonly used modality was herbal products such as herbal tea and herbal meal, mostly stinging nettle (Urtica dioica). The findings of this study indicate that CAM users were children who were an average of 3 years older than nonuser children and that CAM use was more prevalent among the children who had been diagnosed with cancer for a longer time than nonusers. There were no significant difference between users and nonusers regarding sociodemographic characteristics (such as age education level, economic status), hopelessness score of parents, gender of child, and treatment status. Healthcare providers should remain informed about the benefits and adverse effects of complementary and alternative therapies to discuss treatment options with patients and their families and to monitor treatment efficacy.
在患癌儿童中,补充和替代医学(CAM)的使用正变得越来越普遍。因此,深入了解CAM使用的流行情况及相关因素很重要。本研究呈现了对88名患癌儿童家长的研究结果,这些儿童在土耳其东部一家儿科肿瘤病房接受或曾接受过儿童癌症的常规治疗。研究结果表明,48.9%的受访者报告使用了1种或更多CAM疗法。最常用的方式是草药产品,如草药茶和草药餐,主要是荨麻(Urtica dioica)。本研究结果表明,使用CAM的儿童比不使用的儿童平均大3岁,且与未使用者相比,CAM在确诊癌症时间更长的儿童中更为普遍。在社会人口学特征(如年龄、教育水平、经济状况)、家长的绝望评分、儿童性别和治疗状态方面,使用者和非使用者之间没有显著差异。医疗保健提供者应了解补充和替代疗法的益处和不良反应,以便与患者及其家属讨论治疗选择并监测治疗效果。