• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

额叶变异型额颞叶痴呆患者中日语版简易精神状态检查表的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Frontal Assessment Battery in patients with the frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia.

作者信息

Nakaaki Shutaro, Murata Yoshie, Sato Junko, Shinagawa Yoshihiro, Matsui Teruo, Tatsumi Hiroshi, Furukawa Toshi A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007 Feb;61(1):78-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01614.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01614.x
PMID:17239043
Abstract

Patients with the frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia (fv-FTD) exhibit deficits of executive functions. However, no single executive function task that might be used to detect the executive function deficits in fv-FTD patients has been established as yet. The frontal assessment battery (FAB) devised by Dubois et al. (2000) has been reported to be a quick and simple bedside screening test that is sensitive for differentiating between FTD and Alzheimer's disease (AD). The present study was conducted with the aim of ascertaining the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the FAB among Japanese patients with fv-FTD. The Japanese version of FAB was given to patients with mild fv-FTD (n = 18) and those with AD (n = 18). The test-retest reliability was evaluated after a 3-week interval by the same interviewer. Data from the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Keio version: KWCST) were also collected to ascertain the validity of the FAB. The Japanese version of the FAB exhibited good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50-0.84) and good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.89, 95%CI = 0.77-0.95). Significant correlations were observed between the total FAB score and the category achieved (r = 0.454, P < 0.05) and number of perseveration errors (number of errors that were perseverations; r = 0.719, P < 0.01) in the KWCST. A cut-off of 10 for the total FAB score yielded the highest sensitivity (85%) and specificity (92%) for discriminating between patients with fv-FTD and AD with the highest positive likelihood (12.0, 95%CI = 2.6-55.4). The Japanese version of the FAB offers promise as an easy and quick bedside screening test to distinguish fv-FTD from AD.

摘要

额颞叶痴呆额叶变异型(fv - FTD)患者存在执行功能缺陷。然而,目前尚未确立可用于检测fv - FTD患者执行功能缺陷的单一执行功能任务。Dubois等人(2000年)设计的额叶评估量表(FAB)据报道是一种快速简便的床边筛查测试,对区分FTD和阿尔茨海默病(AD)具有敏感性。本研究旨在确定日语版FAB在日本fv - FTD患者中的信度和效度。将日语版FAB施用于轻度fv - FTD患者(n = 18)和AD患者(n = 18)。由同一名访谈者在间隔3周后评估重测信度。还收集了威斯康星卡片分类测试(庆应义塾版:KWCST)的数据以确定FAB的效度。日语版FAB表现出良好的内部信度(克朗巴哈系数:0.70,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.50 - 0.84)和良好的重测信度(组内相关系数:0.89,95%CI = 0.77 - 0.95)。在KWCST中,观察到FAB总分与分类完成情况(r = 0.454,P < 0.05)以及持续错误数(持续出现的错误数;r = 0.719,P < 0.01)之间存在显著相关性。FAB总分的截断值为10时,在区分fv - FTD患者和AD患者方面具有最高的敏感性(85%)和特异性(92%),以及最高的阳性似然比(12.0,95%CI = 2.6 - 55.4)。日语版FAB有望成为一种简便快速的床边筛查测试,用于区分fv - FTD和AD。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Frontal Assessment Battery in patients with the frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia.额叶变异型额颞叶痴呆患者中日语版简易精神状态检查表的信度和效度
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007 Feb;61(1):78-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01614.x.
2
Japanese version of the Frontal Assessment Battery for dementia.用于痴呆症的日本版额叶评估量表。
Psychiatry Res. 2007 Sep 30;153(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.04.004. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
3
The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB): normative data from an Italian sample and performances of patients with Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.额叶评估量表(FAB):来自意大利样本的常模数据以及阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆患者的表现
Funct Neurol. 2004 Jul-Sep;19(3):191-5.
4
[Validity of the Spanish version of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination for the diagnosis of dementia and to differentiate Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia].[用于痴呆诊断以及区分阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆的阿登布鲁克认知检查西班牙文版的效度]
Rev Neurol. 2005;41(12):717-21.
5
Frontal Behavioural Inventory in the differential diagnosis of dementia.用于痴呆鉴别诊断的额叶行为量表
Acta Neurol Scand. 2008 Apr;117(4):260-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00934.x. Epub 2007 Oct 8.
6
Do visuospatial and constructional disturbances differentiate frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease? an experimental study of a clinical belief.视觉空间和结构障碍能否区分额颞叶痴呆的额叶变异型与阿尔茨海默病?一项关于临床观点的实验研究。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002 Jul;17(7):641-8. doi: 10.1002/gps.654.
7
The frontal assessment battery does not differentiate frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease.额叶评估量表无法区分额颞叶痴呆和阿尔茨海默病。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;22(2):125-31. doi: 10.1159/000093665. Epub 2006 May 29.
8
The Middelheim Frontality Score: a behavioural assessment scale that discriminates frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease.米德尔海姆额叶征评分:一种区分额颞叶痴呆与阿尔茨海默病的行为评估量表。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;20(1):70-9. doi: 10.1002/gps.1249.
9
Frontal assessment battery and differential diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease.额叶评估量表与额颞叶痴呆和阿尔茨海默病的鉴别诊断
Arch Neurol. 2004 Jul;61(7):1104-7. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.7.1104.
10
A short neuropsychologic and cognitive evaluation of frontotemporal dementia.额颞叶痴呆的简短神经心理学和认知评估
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009 Apr;111(3):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.10.012. Epub 2008 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Frontal Assessment Battery in Patients with Stroke.日本版简易精神状态检查表在脑卒中患者中的效度和信度
Neurol Int. 2024 Sep 25;16(5):1086-1093. doi: 10.3390/neurolint16050081.
2
A systematic review of cognitive and behavioral tools to differentiate behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia from other conditions.一项关于区分行为变异型额颞叶痴呆与其他病症的认知和行为工具的系统综述。
PCN Rep. 2024 Jun 16;3(2):e210. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.210. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Decreased beta-band activity in left supramarginal gyrus reflects cognitive decline: Evidence from a large clinical dataset in patients with dementia.
左缘上回的β波段活动减少反映认知能力下降:来自痴呆症患者大型临床数据集的证据。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Dec 1;44(17):6214-6226. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26507. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
4
Prefrontal activation during dual-task seated stepping and walking performed by subacute stroke patients with hemiplegia.偏瘫亚急性卒中患者在坐位双任务踏步和行走过程中的前额叶激活。
Front Neurosci. 2023 May 5;17:1169744. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1169744. eCollection 2023.
5
The Prognostic Utility of a Geriatric Assessment for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapy: A Prospective Observational Study.老年综合评估对接受吉西他滨为基础化疗的胰腺癌患者预后预测价值:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Intern Med. 2023 Jun 1;62(11):1573-1580. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9689-22. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
6
Multiscale Entropy of Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Differentiates Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Multiple System Atrophy.静息态功能磁共振成像的多尺度熵可区分进行性核上性麻痹和多系统萎缩。
Life (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;11(12):1411. doi: 10.3390/life11121411.
7
The Frontal Assessment Battery 20 years later: normative data for a shortened version (FAB15).额叶评估测验 20 年后:缩短版的常模数据(FAB15)。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Mar;43(3):1709-1719. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05544-0. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
8
Are saving appearance responses typical communication patterns in Alzheimer's disease?在阿尔茨海默病中,挽救面子反应是典型的沟通模式吗?
PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0197468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197468. eCollection 2018.
9
The Beneficial Effects of Cognitive Training With Simple Calculation and Reading Aloud (SCRA) in the Elderly Postoperative Population: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.简单计算与大声朗读认知训练(SCRA)对老年术后人群的有益影响:一项随机对照试验试点研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2018 Mar 28;10:68. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00068. eCollection 2018.
10
Indication of Cognitive Change and Associated Risk Factor after Thoracic Surgery in the Elderly: A Pilot Study.老年患者胸外科手术后认知功能改变及相关危险因素:一项初步研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Dec 5;9:396. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00396. eCollection 2017.