• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本版简易精神状态检查表在脑卒中患者中的效度和信度

Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Frontal Assessment Battery in Patients with Stroke.

作者信息

Sakai Katsuya, Hosoi Yuichiro, Harada Yusuke, Morikawa Kenji, Kato Yuichi

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 116-8551, Japan.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.

出版信息

Neurol Int. 2024 Sep 25;16(5):1086-1093. doi: 10.3390/neurolint16050081.

DOI:10.3390/neurolint16050081
PMID:39452683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11510384/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), which is used to assess executive function, has been translated into several languages and shown to be valid and reliable. However, the validity and reliability of the Japanese version in patients with stroke are unknown. This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FAB in patients with stroke.

METHODS

The Japanese version of the FAB for dementia was modified and evaluated in 52 patients with stroke. FAB measurements were obtained twice over a 10-day period. Convergent validity was assessed using the Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT) and the Trail Making Test (TMT) part B. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha (Cα). Test-retest evaluations were performed using intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC (2.1)] measurements, and limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated using the total FAB score.

RESULTS

The mean total FAB score was 13.4 ± 2.8 points, the ICC (2.1) was 0.856, and Cα was 0.92. The total FAB score was correlated with SCWT scores for parts I through IV (r = 0.70 to 0.77) and the TMT score for part B (ρ = -0.53). The LOA were -1.7 to 2.9 points.

CONCLUSIONS

The Japanese version of the FAB had higher validity and reliability in patients with stroke.

摘要

背景

用于评估执行功能的额叶评估量表(FAB)已被翻译成多种语言,并被证明是有效且可靠的。然而,其日语版本在中风患者中的有效性和可靠性尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨FAB日语版本在中风患者中的有效性和可靠性。

方法

对用于痴呆症的FAB日语版本进行修改,并在52例中风患者中进行评估。在10天内对FAB进行了两次测量。使用斯特鲁普颜色词测试(SCWT)和连线测验(TMT)B部分评估收敛效度。使用克朗巴赫α系数(Cα)测量内部一致性。使用组内相关系数[ICC(2.1)]测量进行重测评估,并使用FAB总分计算一致性界限(LOA)。

结果

FAB总分平均为13.4±2.8分,ICC(2.1)为0.856,Cα为0.92。FAB总分与SCWT第一至第四部分的得分(r = 0.70至0.77)和TMT B部分的得分(ρ = -0.53)相关。LOA为-1.7至2.9分。

结论

FAB日语版本在中风患者中具有较高的有效性和可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8e/11510384/e998d64bf763/neurolint-16-00081-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8e/11510384/e998d64bf763/neurolint-16-00081-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8e/11510384/e998d64bf763/neurolint-16-00081-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Frontal Assessment Battery in Patients with Stroke.日本版简易精神状态检查表在脑卒中患者中的效度和信度
Neurol Int. 2024 Sep 25;16(5):1086-1093. doi: 10.3390/neurolint16050081.
2
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Frontal Assessment Battery in patients with the frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia.额叶变异型额颞叶痴呆患者中日语版简易精神状态检查表的信度和效度
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007 Feb;61(1):78-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01614.x.
3
Assessment of executive functions in older adults: Translation and initial validation of the Swedish version of the Frontal Assessment Battery, FAB-Swe.老年人执行功能评估:瑞典版额叶评估成套测验(FAB-Swe)的翻译与初步验证。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Jan-Feb;31(1):64-68. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1990929. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
4
Psychometric properties of Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale in patients with stroke.富勒顿高级平衡量表在中风患者中的心理测量学特性。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2024 Mar;31(2):145-156. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2023.2235800. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
5
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB-E) and normative values in a representative adult population sample.《正面评估测验(FAB-E)西班牙语版的心理测量学特性及代表性成年人群样本的常模值》
Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2024 Oct;39(8):694-700. doi: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
6
Validity, reliability, and measurement error of the Japanese version of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire for patients with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者日本版步态冻结问卷的效度、信度和测量误差
Physiother Theory Pract. 2025 Apr;41(4):820-826. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2024.2361325. Epub 2024 May 30.
7
A study on the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Scenario Test for people with chronic stroke-induced aphasia: A cross-sectional study.一项关于慢性脑卒中性失语症患者情景测试日语版的信度和效度的研究:一项横断面研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1878-1892. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13040. Epub 2024 May 1.
8
Validity and Reliability of the New Chinese Version of the Frontal Assessment Battery-Phonemic.《Frontal Assessment Battery-Phonemic 中文修订版的效度和信度》
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(1):371-381. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201028.
9
Japanese version of the Frontal Assessment Battery for dementia.用于痴呆症的日本版额叶评估量表。
Psychiatry Res. 2007 Sep 30;153(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.04.004. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
10
Measuring executive dysfunction in Parkinson's disease: Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB-E).帕金森病执行功能的测量:Frontal Assessment Battery(FAB-E)西班牙语版的信度和效度。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 19;13(11):e0207698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207698. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Components of frontal assessment battery and clinical features in patients with stroke.中风患者的额叶评估量表组成部分及临床特征
J Rehabil Med. 2025 Jun 25;57:jrm43270. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v57.43270.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between the executive dysfunction and balance function in patients with stroke.脑卒中患者执行功能与平衡功能的相关性研究。
Brain Behav. 2024 May;14(5):e3542. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3542.
2
Intervention and assessment of executive dysfunction in patients with stroke: A scoping review.干预和评估脑卒中患者的执行功能障碍:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 6;19(2):e0298000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298000. eCollection 2024.
3
Walking Ability Associated with Executive Dysfunction in Patients with Stroke: A Cross-Sectional Study.
中风患者步行能力与执行功能障碍的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):627. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040627.
4
Executive Function Poststroke: Concepts, Recovery, and Interventions.中风后的执行功能:概念、恢复及干预措施
Stroke. 2023 Jan;54(1):20-29. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.037946. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
5
Hand movements in Mild Cognitive Impairment: clinical implications and insights for future research.轻度认知障碍中的手部运动:临床意义及对未来研究的启示。
J Integr Neurosci. 2022 Mar 23;21(2):67. doi: 10.31083/j.jin2102067.
6
The Frontal Assessment Battery 20 years later: normative data for a shortened version (FAB15).额叶评估测验 20 年后:缩短版的常模数据(FAB15)。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Mar;43(3):1709-1719. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05544-0. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
7
Test-retest reliability and measurement error of the modified gait efficacy scale in individuals with stroke.改良步态疗效量表在脑卒中患者中的重测信度和测量误差。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Nov;38(13):2956-2961. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1952669. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
8
Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures.最小重要变化(MIC):对患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)指标的MIC估计值进行概念澄清和系统综述
Qual Life Res. 2021 Oct;30(10):2729-2754. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
9
Value of the Frontal Assessment Battery Tool for Assessing the Frontal Lobe Function in Stroke Patients.简易精神状态检查表工具在评估脑卒中患者额叶功能中的价值。
Ann Rehabil Med. 2020 Aug;44(4):261-272. doi: 10.5535/arm.19111. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
10
Can robotic gait rehabilitation plus Virtual Reality affect cognitive and behavioural outcomes in patients with chronic stroke? A randomized controlled trial involving three different protocols.机器人步态康复联合虚拟现实能否改善慢性脑卒中患者的认知和行为结局?一项涉及三种不同方案的随机对照试验
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Aug;29(8):104994. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104994. Epub 2020 Jun 13.