• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新加坡英语版儿童生活质量问卷(KINDL)的因子结构

Factor structure of the Singapore English version of the KINDL children quality of life questionnaire.

作者信息

Wee Hwee-Lin, Ravens-Sieberer Ulrike, Erhart Michael, Li Shu-Chuen

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Republic of Singapore.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jan 19;5:4. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-4.

DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-5-4
PMID:17239229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1796858/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality of life (QoL) outcomes are useful in the assessment of physical, mental and social well-being and for informed healthcare decision making. However, few studies have evaluated QoL issues among Asian children due largely to the lack of culturally valid and reliable QoL questionnaires. Hence, we aimed to report the psychometric properties, in particular factor structure, of KINDL (Singapore) questionnaires among school-going children.

METHODS

Students aged 8-16 years from participating schools were selected by convenience sampling. Subjects self-completed KINDL-Kid (Singapore) and KINDL-Kiddo (Singapore) questionnaires, which were cross-culturally adapted from KINDL (Germany English) for use in Singapore. We evaluated floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency and performed factor analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 328 respondents (mean (SD) age: 9.6 (1.31) years; 67% female; 75% Chinese, 16% Malays, 9% Indians and others) completed KINDL-Kid while 1,026 respondents (mean (SD) age: 14.0 (1.00) years; 82% female; 82% Chinese, 12% Malays; 6% Indians and others) completed KINDL-Kiddo. Mean (SD) TOTAL QoL score was 65.5 (12.76) and 56.6 (11.92) for KINDL-Kid and KINDL-Kiddo, respectively. Floor and ceiling effects were important in five of six KINDL-Kid and two of six KINDL-Kiddo subscales. Reliability coefficients ranged from 0.40 to 0.71 (KINDL-Kid) and 0.44 to 0.84 (KINDL-Kiddo). Factor analysis generated eight and seven factors in KINDL-Kid and KINDL-Kiddo, respectively.

CONCLUSION

KINDL-Kiddo exhibited good psychometric properties and may be used to assess QoL in this multi-ethnic English-speaking Asian population. However, psychometric properties of KINDL-Kid may need to be improved either by developing new items or modifying existing items.

摘要

背景

生活质量(QoL)结果有助于评估身体、心理和社会福祉,以及为明智的医疗保健决策提供依据。然而,由于缺乏文化上有效且可靠的生活质量问卷,很少有研究评估亚洲儿童的生活质量问题。因此,我们旨在报告适用于学龄儿童的KINDL(新加坡)问卷的心理测量特性,特别是因子结构。

方法

通过便利抽样从参与学校中选取8至16岁的学生。受试者自行完成KINDL-Kid(新加坡)和KINDL-Kiddo(新加坡)问卷,这两份问卷是从KINDL(德国英语版)跨文化改编而来,用于新加坡。我们评估了地板效应和天花板效应、内部一致性并进行了因子分析。

结果

共有328名受访者(平均(标准差)年龄:9.6(1.31)岁;67%为女性;75%为华人,16%为马来人,9%为印度人及其他)完成了KINDL-Kid问卷,1026名受访者(平均(标准差)年龄:14.0(1.00)岁;82%为女性;82%为华人,12%为马来人;6%为印度人及其他)完成了KINDL-Kiddo问卷。KINDL-Kid和KINDL-Kiddo的平均(标准差)总生活质量得分分别为65.5(12.76)和56.6(11.92)。在KINDL-Kid的六个子量表中有五个以及KINDL-Kiddo的六个子量表中有两个存在明显的地板效应和天花板效应。信度系数范围为0.40至0.71(KINDL-Kid)和0.44至0.84(KINDL-Kiddo)。因子分析在KINDL-Kid中产生了八个因子,在KINDL-Kiddo中产生了七个因子。

结论

KINDL-Kiddo表现出良好的心理测量特性,可用于评估这个多民族英语亚洲人群的生活质量。然而,KINDL-Kid的心理测量特性可能需要通过开发新项目或修改现有项目来加以改进。

相似文献

1
Factor structure of the Singapore English version of the KINDL children quality of life questionnaire.新加坡英语版儿童生活质量问卷(KINDL)的因子结构
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jan 19;5:4. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-4.
2
Reliability and validity of a Nepalese version of the Kiddo-KINDL in adolescents.《尼泊尔版儿童生活质量量表在青少年中的信度和效度》
Biosci Trends. 2010 Aug;4(4):178-85.
3
Psychometric evaluation and wording effects on the Chinese version of the parent-proxy Kid-KINDL.中文版家长代理儿童生活质量量表(Kid-KINDL)的心理测量学评估及措辞效应
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 5;14(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0526-3.
4
[The psychometric properties of the new Turkish generic health-related quality of life questionnaire for children (Kid-KINDL)].[新型土耳其儿童通用健康相关生活质量问卷(Kid-KINDL)的心理测量学特性]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2008 Winter;19(4):409-17.
5
Validation of the English version of the KINDL generic children's health-related quality of life instrument for an Asian population--results from a pilot test.适用于亚洲人群的KINDL通用儿童健康相关生活质量量表英文版的验证——一项预试验的结果
Qual Life Res. 2005 May;14(4):1193-200. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-2957-2.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwanese version of the Kiddo-kINDL generic children's health-related quality of life instrument.台湾版儿童生活质量通用量表Kiddo-kINDL的心理测量学评估
Qual Life Res. 2008 May;17(4):603-11. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9328-3.
7
Cross-cultural Measurement Equivalence of the KINDL Questionnaire for Quality of Life Assessment in Children and Adolescents.用于儿童和青少年生活质量评估的KINDL问卷的跨文化测量等效性
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2016 Apr;47(2):291-304. doi: 10.1007/s10578-015-0568-5.
8
The psychometric study of the Serbian KINDL questionnaire for health-related quality of life assessment in children and adolescents.塞尔维亚儿童青少年健康相关生活质量评估KINDL问卷的心理测量学研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Jun;23(2):361-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00617.x.
9
Ethnic differences in quality of life in adolescents among Chinese, Malay and Indians in Singapore.新加坡华人、马来人和印度青少年生活质量的种族差异。
Qual Life Res. 2005 Sep;14(7):1755-68. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-1741-2.
10
Reliability and validity of the English (Singapore) and Chinese (Singapore) versions of the Short-Form 36 version 2 in a multi-ethnic urban Asian population in Singapore.新加坡多族群城市亚洲人群中短表 36 版本 2 的英文(新加坡)和中文(新加坡)版本的信度和效度。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Nov;22(9):2501-8. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0381-1. Epub 2013 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-sectional and prospective associations between children's 24-h time use and their health-related quality of life: a compositional isotemporal substitution approach.儿童24小时时间利用与健康相关生活质量之间的横断面和前瞻性关联:一种成分等时替代方法。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Oct 6;41:100918. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100918. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
A Machine Learning Approach to Assess Differential Item Functioning of the KINDL Quality of Life Questionnaire Across Children with and Without ADHD.一种机器学习方法评估 ADHD 儿童与非 ADHD 儿童的 KINDL 生活质量问卷的差异项目功能。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2022 Oct;53(5):980-991. doi: 10.1007/s10578-021-01179-6. Epub 2021 May 7.
3
Finnish schoolchildren's perceived health-related quality of life deteriorates remarkably with age.芬兰学童感知到的与健康相关的生活质量随年龄增长显著下降。
Scand J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Psychol. 2019 Jan 7;6(4):152-158. doi: 10.21307/sjcapp-2018-014. eCollection 2018.
4
Raters Interpret Positively and Negatively Worded Items Similarly in a Quality of Life Instrument for Children.在一份儿童生活质量量表中,评分者对正向和负向措辞的项目解读相似。
Inquiry. 2017 Jan;54:46958017696724. doi: 10.1177/0046958017696724.
5
Psychometric evaluation and wording effects on the Chinese version of the parent-proxy Kid-KINDL.中文版家长代理儿童生活质量量表(Kid-KINDL)的心理测量学评估及措辞效应
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 5;14(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0526-3.
6
Health-related quality of life compared with cardiopulmonary exercise testing at the midterm follow-up visit after tetralogy of Fallot repair: a study of the German competence network for congenital heart defects.法洛四联症修复术后中期随访时与心肺运动试验相比的健康相关生活质量:德国先天性心脏病能力网络的一项研究
Pediatr Cardiol. 2013 Jun;34(5):1081-7. doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0603-2. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
7
Serbian KINDL questionnaire for quality of life assessments in healthy children and adolescents: reproducibility and construct validity.塞尔维亚用于健康儿童和青少年生活质量评估的KINDL问卷:信度与结构效度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Aug 28;7:79. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-79.
8
Health-related quality-of-life measures for long-term follow-up in children after major trauma.重大创伤后儿童长期随访的健康相关生活质量测量
Qual Life Res. 2008 Jun;17(5):701-13. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9339-0. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwanese version of the Kiddo-kINDL generic children's health-related quality of life instrument.台湾版儿童生活质量通用量表Kiddo-kINDL的心理测量学评估
Qual Life Res. 2008 May;17(4):603-11. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9328-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Meaning of health-related quality of life among children and adolescents in an Asian country: a focus group approach.亚洲国家儿童和青少年健康相关生活质量的意义:焦点小组研究方法
Qual Life Res. 2006 Jun;15(5):821-31. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-5092-9.
2
Preliminary evidence on the measurement properties of the Chinese version of the Child Health Questionnaire, parent form (CHQ-pF50) and child form (CHQ-CF87).中文版儿童健康问卷家长版(CHQ-pF50)和儿童版(CHQ-CF87)测量特性的初步证据。
Qual Life Res. 2005 Sep;14(7):1775-81. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-1005-1.
3
Ethnic differences in quality of life in adolescents among Chinese, Malay and Indians in Singapore.新加坡华人、马来人和印度青少年生活质量的种族差异。
Qual Life Res. 2005 Sep;14(7):1755-68. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-1741-2.
4
Chinese version of the parent-proxy health-related quality of life measure for children with epilepsy: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and reliability studies.癫痫患儿父母代理健康相关生活质量测量量表的中文版:翻译、跨文化调适及信度研究
Epilepsy Behav. 2005 Dec;7(4):697-707. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.05.006. Epub 2005 Aug 18.
5
Preliminary validation of the Chinese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory.儿童生活质量量表中文版的初步验证
Int J Rehabil Res. 2005 Sep;28(3):219-27. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200509000-00004.
6
Validation of the English version of the KINDL generic children's health-related quality of life instrument for an Asian population--results from a pilot test.适用于亚洲人群的KINDL通用儿童健康相关生活质量量表英文版的验证——一项预试验的结果
Qual Life Res. 2005 May;14(4):1193-200. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-2957-2.
7
Development and psychometric properties of the Chinese language version of the TAPQOL: a health-related quality of life instrument for preschool children.《幼儿生活质量评估量表》中文版的编制及其心理测量学特性:一种用于学龄前儿童的健康相关生活质量工具
Int J Nurs Stud. 2005 May;42(4):457-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.08.001.
8
Health related quality of life of adolescents in Vietnam: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Adolescent Duke Health Profile.越南青少年与健康相关的生活质量:青少年杜克健康量表的跨文化调适与验证
J Adolesc. 2005 Feb;28(1):127-46. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.11.016.
9
The quality of life for cancer children (QOLCC) in Taiwan (part I): reliability and construct validity by confirmatory factor analysis.台湾癌症儿童生活质量(QOLCC)(第一部分):基于验证性因素分析的信度与结构效度
Psychooncology. 2004 Mar;13(3):161-70. doi: 10.1002/pon.728.
10
The Arabic version of childhood health assessment questionnaire modified for Arabic children.
Saudi Med J. 2004 Jan;25(1):83-7.