Kim Theodore, Lau Joseph, Erban John
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Clin Breast Cancer. 2006 Dec;7(5):386-95. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2006.n.055.
Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive type of breast cancer. No randomized controlled trial or systematic review with an IBC-only cohort that evaluates interventions has been published. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to characterize the reporting of clinical criteria and response to neoadjuvant therapy for IBC.
We searched MEDLINE and other sources for the following: previously untreated patients with IBC without metastasis in cohort studies; utilized chemotherapy; and reported clinical outcomes. The following 4 groups were analyzed: no anthracycline induction, low-dose anthracycline induction, moderate-dose anthracycline induction, and high-dose chemotherapy requiring stem cell support. Weighted averages for the overall response rates were calculated using a random effects model.
Twenty-seven studies met all criteria, totaling 1232 patients. Clinical description of IBC eligibility criteria and reported response assessments varied significantly among studies. The response rates and 3- and 5-year overall survival for all 27 studies ranged from 14% to 100%, 22% to 84%, and 32% to 75%, respectively. Pathologic complete response rates after no anthracycline induction, low-dose anthracycline induction, moderate-dose anthracycline induction, and neoadjuvant high-dose chemotherapy subgroups were 4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1%-18%), 11% (95% CI, 7%-17%), 14% (95% CI, 8%-22%), and 32% (95% CI, 24%-41%), respectively.
The criteria and reporting of IBC and treatment response was notably variable, with significant potential for subject heterogeneity. Pathologic complete response rates appear to be related to intensity of neoadjuvant treatment; however, this analysis is not based on randomized data. Future clinical trials should define and report the criteria for IBC diagnosis and response assessment to enhance interstudy comparisons.
炎性乳腺癌(IBC)是最具侵袭性的乳腺癌类型。尚未发表过仅针对IBC队列评估干预措施的随机对照试验或系统评价。我们对文献进行了系统评价,以描述IBC临床标准的报告情况以及对新辅助治疗的反应。
我们在MEDLINE及其他来源中检索了以下内容:队列研究中先前未接受过治疗且无转移的IBC患者;使用了化疗;并报告了临床结局。分析了以下4组:无蒽环类药物诱导、低剂量蒽环类药物诱导、中等剂量蒽环类药物诱导以及需要干细胞支持的高剂量化疗。使用随机效应模型计算总体缓解率的加权平均值。
27项研究符合所有标准,共计1232例患者。IBC纳入标准的临床描述以及报告的缓解评估在各研究之间差异显著。所有27项研究的缓解率、3年和5年总生存率分别为14%至100%、22%至84%和32%至75%。无蒽环类药物诱导、低剂量蒽环类药物诱导、中等剂量蒽环类药物诱导以及新辅助高剂量化疗亚组的病理完全缓解率分别为4%(95%置信区间[CI],1% - 18%)、11%(95%CI,7% - 17%)、14%(95%CI,8% - 22%)和32%(95%CI,24% - 41%)。
IBC的标准及治疗反应报告存在显著差异,存在明显的受试者异质性可能性。病理完全缓解率似乎与新辅助治疗的强度有关;然而,该分析并非基于随机数据。未来的临床试验应明确并报告IBC诊断和反应评估的标准,以加强研究间的比较。