Suppr超能文献

跟腱主体肌腱病的离心负荷、冲击波治疗或观察等待策略:一项随机对照试验。

Eccentric loading, shock-wave treatment, or a wait-and-see policy for tendinopathy of the main body of tendo Achillis: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Rompe Jan D, Nafe Bernhard, Furia John P, Maffulli Nicola

机构信息

OrthoTrauma Clinic, Kirchheimer Str. 60, 67269 Gruenstadt, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):374-83. doi: 10.1177/0363546506295940. Epub 2007 Jan 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few randomized controlled trials compare different methods of management in chronic tendinopathy of the main body of tendo Achillis.

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of 3 management strategies-group 1, eccentric loading; group 2, repetitive low-energy shock-wave therapy (SWT); and group 3, wait and see-in patients with chronic tendinopathy of the main body of tendo Achillis.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with a chronic recalcitrant (>6 months) noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy were enrolled in a randomized controlled study. All patients had received unsuccessful management for >3 months, including at least (1) peritendinous local injections, (2) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and (3) physiotherapy. A computerized random-number generator was used to draw up an allocation schedule. Analysis was on intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

At 4 months from baseline, the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment (VISA)-A score increased in all groups, from 51 to 76 points in group 1 (eccentric loading), from 50 to 70 points in group 2 (repetitive low-energy SWT), and from 48 to 55 points in group 3 (wait and see). Pain rating decreased in all groups, from 7 to 4 points in group 1, from 7 to 4 points in group 2, and from 8 to 6 points in group 3. Fifteen of 25 patients in group 1 (60%), 13 of 25 patients in group 2 (52%), and 6 of 25 patients in Group 3 (24%) reported a Likert scale of 1 or 2 points ("completely recovered" or "much improved"). For all outcome measures, groups 1 and 2 did not differ significantly. For all outcome measures, groups 1 and 2 showed significantly better results than group 3.

CONCLUSION

At 4-month follow-up, eccentric loading and low-energy SWT showed comparable results. The wait-and-see strategy was ineffective for the management of chronic recalcitrant tendinopathy of the main body of the Achilles tendon.

摘要

背景

很少有随机对照试验比较跟腱主体慢性肌腱病的不同治疗方法。

目的

比较3种治疗策略的效果——第1组,离心负荷;第2组,重复性低能量冲击波疗法(SWT);第3组,观察等待——用于跟腱主体慢性肌腱病患者。

研究设计

随机对照试验;证据等级,1级。

方法

75例慢性顽固性(>6个月)非止点性跟腱炎患者纳入一项随机对照研究。所有患者接受>3个月的治疗均未成功,包括至少(1)腱周局部注射、(2)非甾体类抗炎药和(3)物理治疗。使用计算机随机数字生成器制定分配方案。分析基于意向性治疗原则。

结果

从基线开始4个月时,所有组的维多利亚运动评估(VISA)-A评分均升高,第1组(离心负荷)从51分升至76分,第2组(重复性低能量SWT)从50分升至70分,第3组(观察等待)从48分升至55分。所有组的疼痛评分均降低,第1组从7分降至4分,第2组从7分降至4分,第3组从8分降至6分。第1组25例患者中有15例(60%)、第2组25例患者中有13例(52%)、第3组25例患者中有6例(24%)报告Likert评分为1或2分(“完全恢复”或“明显改善”)。对于所有结局指标,第1组和第2组无显著差异。对于所有结局指标,第1组和第2组的结果均显著优于第3组。

结论

在4个月随访时,离心负荷和低能量SWT显示出相似的结果。观察等待策略对慢性顽固性跟腱主体肌腱病的治疗无效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验