Stania Magdalena, Słomka Kajetan J, Juras Grzegorz, Król Tomasz, Król Piotr
Institute of Sport Sciences, Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland.
Department of Kinesitherapy and Special Methods, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Front Neurol. 2024 Jul 10;15:1434983. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1434983. eCollection 2024.
Physiotherapists and physicians continue to seek effective conservative treatments for Achilles tendinopathy. This study aimed to subjectively and objectively determine the therapeutic efficacy of radial shock wave therapy (RSWT) and ultrasound therapy in non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy.
Thirty-nine patients with non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy were randomly assigned to three experimental groups, i.e., RSWT (group A), ultrasound therapy (group B), and placebo ultrasound (group C) groups. Before the intervention and at weeks 1 and 6 after the treatment, the patients were assessed using the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire and posturographic measurements of step initiation performed on the force platforms under two different conditions (non-perturbed transit and perturbed transit).
Six weeks after therapy, all groups exhibited significantly increased VISA-A scores against the measurement at week 1 after therapy. The post-therapy percentage changes in VISA-A scores were significantly greater in group A compared to group B. The three-way ANOVA demonstrated that treatment type affected sway range in the frontal plane and mean velocity of the centre of foot pressure displacements in the sagittal and frontal planes during quiet standing before step initiation. The post-hoc test showed that the means of all those variables were significantly smaller for group A than for group B patients. The three-way ANOVA revealed an effect of the platform arrangement on transit time and double-support period. The post-hoc test revealed statistically longer transit time for the perturbed vs. non-perturbed trials; a reverse relationship was observed for the double-support period.
The VISA-A showed that RSWT was significantly more effective than sonotherapy for alleviation of pain intensity as well as function and activity improvement in patients with non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Therefore, RSWT therapy can be used in clinical practice by physiotherapists to alleviate the symptoms of non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Objective data registered by force platforms during quiet standing before and after step initiation did not prove useful for monitoring the progress of treatment applied to patients with non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy between consecutive therapy interventions.https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000860369, identifier (ACTRN12617000860369).
物理治疗师和医生一直在寻找治疗跟腱病的有效保守疗法。本研究旨在主观和客观地确定径向冲击波疗法(RSWT)和超声疗法对非插入性跟腱病的治疗效果。
39例非插入性跟腱病患者被随机分为三个实验组,即RSWT组(A组)、超声治疗组(B组)和安慰剂超声组(C组)。在干预前以及治疗后第1周和第6周,使用维多利亚运动评估-跟腱(VISA-A)问卷对患者进行评估,并在两种不同条件下(无干扰行走和受干扰行走)在测力平台上对步起始进行姿势描记测量。
治疗6周后,与治疗后第1周的测量结果相比,所有组的VISA-A评分均显著提高。A组治疗后VISA-A评分的百分比变化显著大于B组。三因素方差分析表明,治疗类型会影响起始步前安静站立时额平面的摆动范围以及矢状面和额平面足压中心位移的平均速度。事后检验表明,A组所有这些变量的均值均显著低于B组患者。三因素方差分析显示平台设置对通过时间和双支撑期有影响。事后检验显示,受干扰试验与无干扰试验相比,通过时间在统计学上更长;双支撑期则呈现相反关系。
VISA-A显示,对于缓解非插入性跟腱病患者的疼痛强度以及改善功能和活动,RSWT比超声疗法显著更有效。因此,物理治疗师可在临床实践中使用RSWT疗法来缓解非插入性跟腱病的症状。在起始步前后安静站立期间由测力平台记录的客观数据对于监测非插入性跟腱病患者在连续治疗干预之间所接受治疗的进展并无帮助。https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000860369,标识符(ACTRN12617000860369)