Ivens U, Serup J, O'goshi K
Department of Dermatology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Skin Res Technol. 2007 Feb;13(1):110-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2007.00232.x.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) system for clinical scoring of allergic patch test reactions is well established in clinical dermatology for detailed scoring of allergic reactions. The degree of redness and the presence of swelling, papules, vesicles and bullae are assessed based on visual examination and palpation of reactions. In photographic assessment used in research and tele-dermatology, the scoring is solely based on visual examination of photos. The aim of the study was to evaluate inter-expert variation in patch test reading using photographic images, with ICDRG reading as a reference.
Five experienced senior dermatologists each scored 55 positive patch test reactions from 16 slides in an office environment. The slides showed pictures of patch tests with different allergens. The scoring system by ICDRG with six categories for scoring was used.
The five dermatologists performed the scoring very differently. When the scoring system was simplified to a tripartite scoring system, the scoring was performed almost similarly by the five clinicians.
Based on the present results, it is proposed that the number of scoring categories should be minimized and simplified into negative (including doubtful) reactions, positive reactions and irritant reactions. Such simplified tripartite reading is proposed for research purposes and for tele-dermatology, when scoring is based on photographic images.
背景/目的:国际接触性皮炎研究组(ICDRG)的变应原贴试验反应临床评分系统在临床皮肤科已得到广泛应用,用于详细评估过敏反应。通过视觉检查和触诊反应来评估红斑程度以及肿胀、丘疹、水疱和大疱的存在情况。在研究和远程皮肤病学中使用的摄影评估中,评分仅基于对照片的视觉检查。本研究的目的是以ICDRG读数为参考,评估使用摄影图像进行斑贴试验读数时专家之间的差异。
五名经验丰富的资深皮肤科医生在办公室环境中,对来自16张幻灯片的55个阳性斑贴试验反应进行评分。幻灯片展示了不同变应原的斑贴试验图片。采用ICDRG的六类评分系统。
五位皮肤科医生的评分差异很大。当评分系统简化为三方评分系统时,五位临床医生的评分几乎相似。
基于目前的结果,建议将评分类别数量减至最少,并简化为阴性(包括可疑)反应、阳性反应和刺激性反应。当基于摄影图像进行评分时,建议在研究和远程皮肤病学中采用这种简化的三方读数。