Suppr超能文献

基于数字图像评估斑贴试验反应的有效性。

The validity of rating patch test reactions based on digital images.

作者信息

Uter Wolfgang, Becker Detlef, Schnuch Axel, Gefeller Olaf, Frosch Peter J

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Nov;57(5):337-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01236.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The proper reading of patch test (PT) reactions, based on morphological criteria, is of utmost importance. Digital images are increasingly used for medical training.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the diagnostic validity of readings of 20 digital images of various PT reaction grades by congress attendants.

METHODS

122 volunteers took a PT quiz offered during the 8th ESCD meeting, September 2006, Berlin. No information on the respective allergen was given, nor the gold standard grading determined by an European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group (EECDRG) expert panel was disclosed while the quiz was open.

RESULTS

Overall, 63.5% of all ratings agreed 'exactly' with the gold standard, and 87.8% 'grossly', that is, with regard to the distinction between non-positive [doubtful or irritant (IR)] and positive (+, ++, and +++) reactions. Most images prompted a fair proportion of correct classifications. The distinction between doubtful and + and between +++, and strong bullous IR reactions proved partly difficult, probably because of blinding of the test substance. The least experienced in particular tended to misclassify IR reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

The rating of digital images of PT reactions represents just 1 particular, isolated aspect of PT evaluation. Results were largely valid. Thus, the method could be used for continuing medical education, and for standardization in multicentre networks.

摘要

背景

基于形态学标准对斑贴试验(PT)反应进行正确判读至关重要。数字图像在医学培训中的应用日益广泛。

目的

评估参会人员对20张不同PT反应等级数字图像判读的诊断效度。

方法

122名志愿者参加了2006年9月在柏林举行的第8届欧洲接触性皮炎学会(ESCD)会议期间提供的PT测验。测验进行时,未提供有关相应变应原的信息,也未披露由欧洲环境与接触性皮炎研究组(EECDRG)专家小组确定的金标准分级。

结果

总体而言,所有评级中有63.5%与金标准“完全”一致,87.8%“大致”一致,即关于非阳性[可疑或刺激性(IR)]和阳性(+、++和+++)反应之间的区分。大多数图像促使相当比例的正确分类。可疑与+之间以及+++与强烈大疱性IR反应之间的区分部分证明是困难的,可能是因为测试物质的盲法。尤其是经验最少的人往往会对IR反应进行错误分类。

结论

PT反应数字图像的评级仅代表PT评估的一个特定、孤立的方面。结果在很大程度上是有效的。因此,该方法可用于继续医学教育以及多中心网络中的标准化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验