Suppr超能文献

儿童支气管炎的抗生素治疗

Antibiotics for bronchiolitis in children.

作者信息

Spurling G K P, Fonseka K, Doust J, Del Mar C

机构信息

University of Queensland, Discipline of General Practice, Level 2, Edith Cavell Building, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4029.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD005189. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005189.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bronchiolitis is a serious, potentially life-threatening respiratory illness commonly affecting young babies. It is most often caused by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). The diagnosis is usually made on clinical grounds (especially tachypnoea and wheezing in a child less than two years of age). Antibiotics are not recommended for bronchiolitis unless there is concern about complications such as secondary bacterial pneumonia. Despite this, they are used at rates of 34 to 99% in uncomplicated cases.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of antibiotics for bronchiolitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) which includes the Acute Respiratory Infection Groups' specialised register, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2006); MEDLINE (January 1966 to August Week 2, 2006); EMBASE (1990 to March 2006); and Current Contents (2001 to September 2006).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Types of studies: single or double blind randomised controlled trials comparing antibiotics to placebo in the treatment of bronchiolitis.

TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

children under the age of two years diagnosed with bronchiolitis using clinical criteria (including respiratory distress preceded by coryzal symptoms with or without fever). Types of interventions: oral, intravenous, intramuscular or inhaled antibiotics versus placebo. Types of outcome measures: primary clinical outcomes: time for the resolution of symptoms/signs (pulmonary markers: respiratory distress; wheeze; crepitations; oxygen saturation; and fever).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

hospital admissions; time to discharge from hospital; re-admissions; complications/adverse events developed; and radiological findings.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All data were analysed using Review Manager software, version 4.2.7.

MAIN RESULTS

One study met our inclusion criteria. It randomised children presenting clinically with bronchiolitis to either ampicillin or placebo. The main outcome measure was duration of illness and death. There was no significant difference between the two groups for length of illness and there were no deaths in either group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review found no evidence to support the use of antibiotics for bronchiolitis. This results needs to be treated with caution given only one RCT justified inclusion. It is unlikely that simple RCTs of antibiotics against placebo for bronchiolitis will be undertaken in future. Research to identify a possible small subgroup of patients presenting with bronchiolitis-like symptoms who may benefit from antibiotics may be justified. Otherwise, research may be better focussed on determining the reasons for clinicians to use antibiotics so readily for bronchiolitis, and ways of reducing their anxiety, and therefore their use of antibiotics for bronchiolitis.

摘要

背景

细支气管炎是一种严重的、可能危及生命的呼吸道疾病,常见于幼儿。它最常由呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)引起。诊断通常基于临床症状(特别是两岁以下儿童的呼吸急促和喘息)。除非担心有诸如继发性细菌性肺炎等并发症,否则不建议对细支气管炎使用抗生素。尽管如此,在无并发症的病例中,抗生素的使用率仍在34%至99%之间。

目的

评估抗生素在细支气管炎治疗中的应用。

检索策略

我们检索了以下电子数据库:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL),其中包括急性呼吸道感染组的专业注册库、效果评价文摘数据库(DARE)(《Cochrane图书馆》2006年第3期);医学索引(MEDLINE,1966年1月至2006年8月第2周);荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE,1990年至2006年3月);以及《现刊目次》(2001年至2006年9月)。

入选标准

研究类型:比较抗生素与安慰剂治疗细支气管炎的单盲或双盲随机对照试验。

参与者类型

根据临床标准诊断为细支气管炎的两岁以下儿童(包括有或无发热的卡他症状前驱的呼吸窘迫)。干预类型:口服、静脉注射、肌肉注射或吸入抗生素与安慰剂对照。结局指标类型:主要临床结局:症状/体征缓解时间(肺部指标:呼吸窘迫;喘息;啰音;血氧饱和度;以及发热)。

次要结局

住院情况;出院时间;再次入院;出现的并发症/不良事件;以及影像学检查结果。

数据收集与分析

所有数据均使用Review Manager软件4.2.7版进行分析。

主要结果

一项研究符合我们的纳入标准。该研究将临床上表现为细支气管炎的儿童随机分为氨苄西林组或安慰剂组。主要结局指标为疾病持续时间和死亡情况。两组在疾病持续时间上无显著差异,且两组均无死亡病例。

作者结论

本综述未发现支持对细支气管炎使用抗生素的证据。鉴于仅有一项随机对照试验符合纳入标准,该结果需谨慎对待。未来不太可能开展针对细支气管炎的抗生素与安慰剂的简单随机对照试验。确定可能从抗生素中获益的表现为细支气管炎样症状的一小部分患者的研究可能是合理的。否则,研究可能更好地聚焦于确定临床医生如此轻易地对细支气管炎使用抗生素的原因,以及减轻他们的焦虑、从而减少他们对细支气管炎使用抗生素的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验