Rollman Erik, Mathy Nathalie, Bråve Andreas, Boberg Andreas, Kjerrström Anne, van Wely Cathy, Engström Gunnel, Johansson Susanne, Aperia Kajsa, Eriksson Lars E, Benthin Reinhold, Ertl Peter, Heeney Jonathan, Hinkula Jorma, Voss Gerald, Wahren Britta
Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Vaccine. 2007 Mar 1;25(11):2145-54. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.10.057. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
A DNA plasmid encoding human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) env, nef and tat genes was used in mice in a prime-boost immunization regimen with the corresponding recombinant proteins. The genetic immunogen was delivered with a gene gun and the proteins were injected intramuscularly together with the adjuvant AS02A. Immunizations were followed by experimental challenge with pseudotyped HIV-1 subtype A or B virus. In an initial experiment in which animals were challenged four weeks after the final immunization, all single modality and prime-boost vaccinations resulted in a significant level of protection as compared to control animals. There was a trend for DNA-alone immunization yielding the highest protection. In a subsequent study, a late challenge was performed 19 weeks after the final immunization. All groups having received the DNA vaccine, either alone or in combination with adjuvanted protein, exhibited strong protection against HIV replication. The subtype-specific protection against the experimental HIV challenge was significantly stronger than the cross-protection. Cellular and humoral immune responses were assessed during immunization and after challenge, but without clear correlation to protection against HIV replication. The data suggest that either DNA or protein antigens alone provide partial protection against an HIV-1/MuLV challenge and that DNA immunization is essential for achieving very high levels of efficacy in this murine HIV-1 challenge model. While prime-boost combinations were more immunogenic than DNA alone, they did not appear to provide any further enhancement over DNA vaccine mediated efficacy. The DNA immunogen might prime low levels of CD8+ T cells responsible for virus clearance or possibly a yet unidentified mechanism of protection.
一种编码人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)包膜蛋白、负调控因子和反式激活因子基因的DNA质粒,与相应的重组蛋白一起用于小鼠的初免-加强免疫方案。基因免疫原通过基因枪递送,蛋白质与佐剂AS02A一起肌肉注射。免疫后用假型HIV-1 A或B亚型病毒进行实验性攻击。在一项初始实验中,动物在最后一次免疫后四周受到攻击,与对照动物相比,所有单一模式和初免-加强疫苗接种均产生了显著水平的保护作用。单独使用DNA免疫有产生最高保护作用的趋势。在随后的一项研究中,在最后一次免疫后19周进行了延迟攻击。所有接受DNA疫苗的组,无论是单独使用还是与佐剂化蛋白联合使用,均表现出对HIV复制的强大保护作用。针对实验性HIV攻击的亚型特异性保护作用明显强于交叉保护作用。在免疫期间和攻击后评估了细胞和体液免疫反应,但与针对HIV复制的保护作用没有明显相关性。数据表明,单独使用DNA或蛋白质抗原均可对HIV-1/鼠白血病病毒攻击提供部分保护,并且在该小鼠HIV-1攻击模型中,DNA免疫对于实现非常高的疗效至关重要。虽然初免-加强组合比单独使用DNA更具免疫原性,但它们似乎并未比DNA疫苗介导的疗效提供任何进一步的增强作用。DNA免疫原可能启动了负责病毒清除的低水平CD8 + T细胞,或者可能是一种尚未确定的保护机制。