Suppr超能文献

基于大麻的治疗方法用于神经性疼痛和多发性硬化相关疼痛的荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis of cannabis based treatments for neuropathic and multiple sclerosis-related pain.

作者信息

Iskedjian Michael, Bereza Basil, Gordon Allan, Piwko Charles, Einarson Thomas R

机构信息

PharmIdeas Research & Consulting Inc., Oakville, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jan;23(1):17-24. doi: 10.1185/030079906x158066.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Debilitating pain, occurring in 50-70% of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, is poorly understood and infrequently studied. We summarized efficacy and safety data of cannabinoid-based drugs for neuropathic pain.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified from Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases; Bayer Healthcare provided additional trials.

STUDY SELECTION

Accepted were randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled trials of cannabinoid-based treatments for MS-related/neuropathic pain in adults > or = 18 years of age.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers identified studies and extracted data; a third adjudicated disagreements. Data included baseline and endpoint pain scores on visual analog or 11-point ordinal scales.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 18 articles and three randomized controlled trial (RCT) reports identified, 12 articles and two reports were rejected (9 = inappropriate disease or outcome, 1 = duplicate, 1 = review, and 1 = abstract); six accepted articles and one RCT-report involved 298 patients (222 treated, 76 placebo); four examined Sativex (a cannabidiol/delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) buccal spray) (observations = 196), five cannabidiol (n = 41), and three dronabinol (n = 91). Homogeneity chi(2) values were non-significant, allowing data combination. Analyses focused on baseline-endpoint score differences. The cannabidiol/THC buccal spray decreased pain 1.7 +/- 0.7 points (p = 0.018), cannabidiol 1.5 +/- 0.7 (p = 0.044), dronabinol 1.5 +/- 0.6 (p = 0.013), and all cannabinoids pooled together 1.6 +/- 0.4 (p < 0.001). Placebo baseline-endpoint scores did not differ (0.8 +/- 0.4 points, p = 0.023). At endpoint, cannabinoids were superior to placebo by 0.8 +/- 0.3 points (p = 0.029). Dizziness was the most commonly observed adverse event in the cannabidiol/THC buccal spray arms (39 +/- 16%), across all cannabinoid treatments (32.5 +/- 16%) as well as in the placebo arms (10 +/- 4%).

CONCLUSION

Cannabinoids including the cannabidiol/THC buccal spray are effective in treating neuropathic pain in MS.

LIMITATIONS

This review was based on a small number of trials and patients. Pain related to MS was assumed to be similar to neuropathic pain.

摘要

目的

50%-70%的多发性硬化症(MS)患者会出现使人衰弱的疼痛,对此了解甚少且很少进行研究。我们总结了基于大麻素的药物治疗神经性疼痛的疗效和安全性数据。

数据来源

从Medline、Embase和Cochrane数据库中检索研究;拜耳医疗保健公司提供了其他试验。

研究选择

纳入的是针对18岁及以上成年人MS相关/神经性疼痛进行的基于大麻素治疗的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

数据提取

两名评审员确定研究并提取数据;第三名评审员裁决分歧。数据包括视觉模拟量表或11点序数量表上的基线和终点疼痛评分。

数据综合

在确定的18篇文章和3份随机对照试验(RCT)报告中,12篇文章和2份报告被排除(9篇因疾病或结果不适用,1篇为重复研究,1篇为综述,1篇为摘要);6篇纳入的文章和1份RCT报告涉及298名患者(222名接受治疗,76名接受安慰剂治疗);4项研究考察了Sativex(一种大麻二酚/δ-9-四氢大麻酚(THC)口腔喷雾剂)(观察对象=196例),5项研究考察了大麻二酚(n=41),3项研究考察了屈大麻酚(n=91)。同质性卡方值无统计学意义,允许合并数据。分析重点为基线-终点评分差异。大麻二酚/THC口腔喷雾剂使疼痛减轻1.7±0.7分(p=0.018),大麻二酚为1.5±0.7分(p=0.044),屈大麻酚为1.5±0.6分(p=0.013),所有大麻素合并使用时为1.6±0.4分(p<0.001)。安慰剂的基线-终点评分无差异(0.8±0.4分,p=0.023)。在终点时,大麻素比安慰剂优0.8±0.3分(p=0.029)。头晕是大麻二酚/THC口腔喷雾剂组最常观察到的不良事件(39±16%),在所有大麻素治疗组中(32.5±16%)以及安慰剂组中(10±4%)均如此。

结论

包括大麻二酚/THC口腔喷雾剂在内的大麻素对治疗MS中的神经性疼痛有效。

局限性

本综述基于少量试验和患者。假定与MS相关的疼痛与神经性疼痛相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验