Suppr超能文献

透明质酸钠治疗僵硬性拇趾。一项单盲随机研究。

Sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of hallux rigidus. A single-blind, randomized study.

作者信息

Pons Miquel, Alvarez Fernando, Solana Jordi, Viladot Ramón, Varela Luisa

机构信息

Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Sant Rafael, Paseo Vall d'Hebrón 107-117, Barcelona 08035, Spain.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Jan;28(1):38-42. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0007.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular sodium hyaluronate (Ostenil)mini) compared to intra-articular triamcinolone acetonide (Trigon depot) in the treatment of painful hallux rigidus.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients (ages 40 to 80 years) with painful early stage hallux rigidus were enrolled in the study. One group received an intra-articular injection with 1.0 ml sodium hyaluronate (SH); the other received an intra-articular injection of 1.0 ml triamcinolone acetonide (TA). Patients were evaluated on days 0, 14, 28, 56 and 84. Effectiveness was measured using the following parameters: joint pain at rest or on palpation (VAS), with passive motion, and gait pain; AOFAS hallux metatarsophalangeal score; use of analgesics and global assessment of the treatment by the patient and investigator. Safety was evaluated by the outcome of tolerance to treatment and observation of adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using the Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon test and Friedman test.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (40 feet) were evaluated. Pain at rest or with palpation and pain on passive mobilization decreased significantly in both treatment groups in comparison to baseline (p<0.01), but no significant between-group differences were observed (p>0.05). Gait pain improved substantially in the sodium hyaluronate group with significant differences compared to the triamcinolone group at days 28 and 56 (p<0.05). The AOFAS total score improved significantly in the SH group compared to the TA group (p<0.05). This was mainly due to improvements in the pain subscale. No between-group differences were seen regarding the use of analgesics. Global assessment of treatment by patients was good in both groups, and there was a significant between-group difference favoring SH when areas under the curves (AUC) were calculated (p < 0.05). Tolerance was good in both groups. Adverse events occurred in three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular injections of sodium hyaluronate are effective and safe in decreasing hallux rigidus pain. The AOFAS scores in the SH group were significantly better than in the TA group.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估关节腔内注射透明质酸钠(奥施康定)与关节腔内注射曲安奈德(曲安奈德长效注射剂)治疗僵硬性拇趾疼痛的有效性和安全性。

方法

37例年龄在40至80岁之间的早期僵硬性拇趾疼痛患者纳入本研究。一组接受1.0 ml透明质酸钠(SH)关节腔内注射;另一组接受1.0 ml曲安奈德(TA)关节腔内注射。在第0、14、28、56和84天对患者进行评估。使用以下参数测量有效性:静息或触诊时的关节疼痛(视觉模拟评分法)、被动活动时的疼痛以及步态疼痛;美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)拇趾跖趾关节评分;镇痛药的使用情况以及患者和研究者对治疗的总体评估。通过治疗耐受性结果和不良事件观察来评估安全性。使用卡方检验、曼-惠特尼U检验、威尔科克森检验和弗里德曼检验进行统计分析。

结果

对37例患者(40只足)进行了评估。与基线相比,两个治疗组静息或触诊时的疼痛以及被动活动时的疼痛均显著降低(p<0.01),但组间未观察到显著差异(p>0.05)。透明质酸钠组的步态疼痛在第28天和56天有显著改善,与曲安奈德组相比有显著差异(p<0.05)。与TA组相比,SH组的AOFAS总分显著提高(p<0.05)。这主要归因于疼痛子量表的改善。在镇痛药使用方面未观察到组间差异。患者对治疗的总体评估在两组中均良好,在计算曲线下面积(AUC)时,组间存在显著差异,有利于SH组(p<0.05)。两组的耐受性均良好。3例患者发生了不良事件。

结论

关节腔内注射透明质酸钠在减轻僵硬性拇趾疼痛方面有效且安全。SH组的AOFAS评分显著优于TA组。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验