Babiloni Claudio, Brancucci Alfredo, Capotosto Paolo, Del Percio Claudio, Romani Gian Luca, Arendt-Nielsen Lars, Rossini Paolo Maria
Dipartimento di Fisiologia Umana e Farmacologia, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Brain Res Bull. 2007 Mar 15;71(5):475-84. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.10.025. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
Pain sensation is characterized by multiple features that allow to differentiate pricking, burning, aching, stinging, and electrical shock. These features are sub-served by neural pathways that might give flexibility and selectivity to the cerebral anticipatory processes. In this line, the present high-resolution electroencephalography (EEG) study tested the hypothesis that the anticipatory cortical processes are stronger for painful thermal (biologically relevant) than electrical ("artificial") stimuli with similar intensity. EEG data (128 electrodes) were recorded in normal subjects during the expectancy of painful electrical or laser stimuli (visual omitted stimulus paradigm; interval between two painful stimuli: 16s), delivered over the median nerve region of the right arm (nonpainful stimuli as controls). After each stimulus, the subject reported the perceived stimulus intensity. Surface Laplacian estimation of the EEG data spatially enhanced the anticipatory stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN), which reflects motivational relevance of the stimulus. Subjects perceived no difference in the intensity of the electrical versus laser stimuli in both painful and nonpainful conditions. However, the anticipatory SPN appeared over large scalp regions before painful laser but not electrical stimulation. The same was true for the nonpainful stimulations. The present results suggest that the motivational anticipatory cortical processes are induced by nonpainful and painful biologically/ecologically relevant laser stimuli rather than by "artificial" electrical stimuli with similar intensity.
痛觉具有多种特征,这些特征使得人们能够区分刺痛、灼痛、酸痛、刺痛和电击样疼痛。这些特征由神经通路支持,而神经通路可能会赋予大脑预期过程灵活性和选择性。在此方面,当前的高分辨率脑电图(EEG)研究检验了这样一个假设:对于强度相似的疼痛性热刺激(生物学相关)和电刺激(“人工”),预期性皮层过程对前者的反应更强。在正常受试者预期疼痛性电刺激或激光刺激时(视觉遗漏刺激范式;两个疼痛刺激之间的间隔:16秒),记录EEG数据(128个电极),刺激施加于右臂的正中神经区域(非疼痛刺激作为对照)。每次刺激后,受试者报告所感知的刺激强度。EEG数据的表面拉普拉斯估计在空间上增强了预期性刺激前负波(SPN),该负波反映了刺激的动机相关性。在疼痛和非疼痛条件下,受试者在电刺激和激光刺激的强度上均未察觉到差异。然而,预期性SPN在疼痛性激光刺激而非电刺激之前出现在大片头皮区域。非疼痛刺激的情况也是如此。目前的结果表明,动机性预期皮层过程是由非疼痛性和疼痛性生物学/生态学相关的激光刺激诱导的,而非由强度相似的“人工”电刺激诱导。