• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

匈牙利全国性组织的乳腺癌筛查项目首轮筛查的组织情况与结果

The organisation and results of first screening round of the Hungarian nationwide organised breast cancer screening programme.

作者信息

Boncz I, Sebestyén A, Döbrossy L, Péntek Z, Budai A, Kovács A, Dózsa C, Ember I

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, National Health Insurance Fund Administration, Váci út 73/A., 1139 Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2007 Apr;18(4):795-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl489. Epub 2007 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdl489
PMID:17259642
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this paper is to give an overview of organisational issues of the Hungarian nationwide organised breast cancer screening programme and to provide the results of the first screening round of the programme for the years 2002-2003.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were derived from the financial database of the National Health Insurance Fund Administration covering the period 2000-2003. Women who underwent mammography screening were included into the study.

RESULTS

Uptake of the organised screening programme in 2002-2003 was 45.09%, while the recall rate was 7.23%. Malignant cases represented 65.38% of total surgeries and 0.36% of total number of screened women yielding a cancer detection rate 3.6 per 1000 screened women. Malignant cases of 10.78% were identified as ductal carcinoma in situ, while 89.22% was invasive cancer. Benign to malignant ratio was 0.54 : 1.

CONCLUSION

There is therefore an urgent need to closely monitor performance and to review programme policies and procedures with the aim of increasing both the participation rate and the proportion of women eligible to attend screening.

摘要

背景

本文旨在概述匈牙利全国性有组织的乳腺癌筛查项目的组织问题,并提供该项目2002 - 2003年首轮筛查的结果。

患者与方法

数据来源于国家健康保险基金管理局2000 - 2003年期间的财务数据库。纳入接受乳腺钼靶筛查的女性进行研究。

结果

2002 - 2003年有组织筛查项目的参与率为45.09%,召回率为7.23%。恶性病例占手术总数的65.38%,占筛查女性总数的0.36%,癌症检出率为每1000名筛查女性中有3.6例。10.78%的恶性病例被确定为原位导管癌,89.22%为浸润性癌。良性与恶性比例为0.54 : 1。

结论

因此,迫切需要密切监测项目执行情况,并审查项目政策和程序,以提高参与率和符合筛查条件女性的比例。

相似文献

1
The organisation and results of first screening round of the Hungarian nationwide organised breast cancer screening programme.匈牙利全国性组织的乳腺癌筛查项目首轮筛查的组织情况与结果
Ann Oncol. 2007 Apr;18(4):795-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl489. Epub 2007 Jan 27.
2
[The attendance of the first screening round (2002-2003) of the Hungarian organized breast cancer screening program and its effect on the number of diagnostic and screening mammography].[匈牙利有组织的乳腺癌筛查项目首轮筛查(2002 - 2003年)的参与情况及其对诊断性和筛查性乳房X光检查数量的影响]
Orv Hetil. 2005 Sep 18;146(38):1963-70.
3
[Attendance in the second phase (2004-2005) of the Hungarian organized breast cancer screening program].[匈牙利有组织的乳腺癌筛查计划第二阶段(2004 - 2005年)的参与情况]
Orv Hetil. 2008 Aug 10;149(32):1491-8. doi: 10.1556/OH.2008.28248.
4
[Participation rates in the third round (2006-2007) of the breast cancer screening program in Hungary].[匈牙利乳腺癌筛查项目第三轮(2006 - 2007年)的参与率]
Magy Onkol. 2013 Sep;57(3):140-6. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
5
Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.菲英岛县的乳腺钼靶筛查。1993年11月 - 1999年12月。
APMIS Suppl. 2003(110):1-33.
6
Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.1991年4月至1997年3月哥本哈根乳腺癌的乳腺X线筛查。乳腺X线筛查评估小组。
APMIS Suppl. 1998;83:1-44.
7
[Attendance of the fourth (2008-2009) screening round of the Hungarian organized, nationwide breast cancer screening program].[匈牙利组织的全国性乳腺癌筛查项目第四次(2008 - 2009年)筛查轮次的参与情况]
Orv Hetil. 2013 Dec 1;154(50):1975-83. doi: 10.1556/OH.2013.29744.
8
[Results of monitoring the year 2002 of the Hungarian breast cancer screening program].[2002年匈牙利乳腺癌筛查项目的监测结果]
Magy Onkol. 2005;49(2):109-15. Epub 2005 Oct 24.
9
[The state of the organised mammography screening in Hungary in 2006].[2006年匈牙利乳腺X线摄影组织性筛查状况]
Orv Hetil. 2007 May 13;148(19):879-85. doi: 10.1556/OH.2007.28092.
10
The effect of an organized, nationwide breast cancer screening programme on non-organized mammography activities.一项有组织的全国性乳腺癌筛查计划对非组织化乳腺钼靶检查活动的影响。
J Med Screen. 2008;15(1):14-7. doi: 10.1258/jms.2008.007070.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical imaging parameter variation drives domain shift.物理成像参数变化导致域转移。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 9;12(1):21302. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23990-4.
2
Breast Cancer Screening Programmes across the WHO European Region: Differences among Countries Based on National Income Level.世界卫生组织欧洲区域的乳腺癌筛查计划:基于国民收入水平的国家间差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 23;14(4):452. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040452.
3
Recommendations for breast imaging follow-up of women with a previous history of breast cancer: position paper from the Italian Group for Mammography Screening (GISMa) and the Italian College of Breast Radiologists (ICBR) by SIRM.
既往有乳腺癌病史女性的乳腺影像随访建议:意大利乳腺钼靶筛查小组(GISMa)和意大利乳腺放射科医生学会(ICBR)由意大利放射学会(SIRM)发布的立场文件
Radiol Med. 2016 Dec;121(12):891-896. doi: 10.1007/s11547-016-0676-8. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
4
The introduction of a breast cancer screening programme in a region with a population at medium risk for developing breast cancer: Khanty-Mansiysky autonomous Okrug-Ugra (Russian Federation).在一个乳腺癌发病风险中等的地区引入乳腺癌筛查项目:汉特-曼西自治区-尤格拉(俄罗斯联邦)。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2011;5:195. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2011.195. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
5
Should breast cancer survivors be excluded from, or invited to, organised mammography screening programmes?乳腺癌幸存者应被排除在有组织的乳腺癌筛查计划之外,还是应被邀请参加?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 4;11:249. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-249.
6
Breast cancer screening in the Czech Republic: time trends in performance indicators during the first seven years of the organised programme.捷克共和国的乳腺癌筛查:组织项目实施前七年的绩效指标变化趋势。
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 10;11:288. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-288.
7
The disease burden of colorectal cancer in Hungary.匈牙利结直肠癌的疾病负担。
Eur J Health Econ. 2010 Jan;10 Suppl 1:S35-40. doi: 10.1007/s10198-009-0192-z.