Bitsch Rudi G, Heisel Christian, Silva Mauricio, Schmalzried Thomas P
Stiftung Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200A, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
J Orthop Res. 2007 Apr;25(4):423-31. doi: 10.1002/jor.20311.
The resurgence of metal-metal bearings has renewed interest in hip resurfacing, but a paucity of information exists regarding femoral cementing technique. We developed a laboratory model in which 72 open-cell foam specimens were used to simulate bone. Analyses of two cement viscosities, two foam porosities, and six cementing techniques were performed: manual cement application only, manual application and filling of one quarter of the component with cement, filling of half of the component, manual application and half component filling, full component filling, and manual application and full component filling. For manual application, cement was pressurized into the foam by rolling the finger tips. For component filling, a defined quantity of cement was poured into the component before pressing it onto the foam. Specimens were cut into quarters, and cement penetration was quantified in seven areas: top, chamfer, wall, interior area, and proximal, medial, and distal stem. The manual technique showed a 3-mm thick, even cement penetration of the outer fixation surface (top = 26 +/- 0 mm(2), chamfer = 14.9 +/- 0.2 mm(2), wall = 55.6 +/- 5.2 mm(2)). None of the other techniques showed a significantly higher penetration in these areas. Large differences were found between all techniques at the medial stem (27.7 +/- 17.5 mm(2), p < 0.001) and the interior area (128.5 +/- 69.6 mm(2), p = 0.013). An increasing degree of penetration occurred from manual cement application to manual application and full component filling. Sixteen specimens showed incomplete seating, which occurred with all techniques except the manual technique. The manual technique consistently gave an approximately 3-mm thick even cement penetration over the outer fixation area. Pouring any cement into the shell resulted in variable degrees of deeper penetration and a risk of incomplete seating, which have been associated with bone necrosis and early fracture.
金属对金属轴承的再度兴起重新引发了人们对髋关节表面置换术的兴趣,但关于股骨骨水泥固定技术的信息却很匮乏。我们建立了一个实验室模型,使用72个开孔泡沫样本模拟骨骼。对两种骨水泥粘度、两种泡沫孔隙率和六种骨水泥固定技术进行了分析:仅手动涂抹骨水泥、手动涂抹并将部件的四分之一用骨水泥填充、填充部件的一半、手动涂抹并填充部件的一半、完全填充部件以及手动涂抹并完全填充部件。对于手动涂抹,通过用指尖滚动将骨水泥压入泡沫中。对于部件填充,在将部件压到泡沫上之前,将一定量的骨水泥倒入部件中。将样本切成四等份,并在七个区域量化骨水泥渗透情况:顶部、倒角、壁部、内部区域以及近端、内侧和远端柄部。手动技术显示外固定表面有3毫米厚的均匀骨水泥渗透(顶部 = 26 ± 0平方毫米,倒角 = 14.9 ± 0.2平方毫米,壁部 = 55.6 ± 5.2平方毫米)。其他技术在这些区域均未显示出明显更高的渗透。在内侧柄部(27.7 ± 17.5平方毫米,p < 0.001)和内部区域(128.5 ± 69.6平方毫米,p = 0.013),所有技术之间存在很大差异。从手动涂抹骨水泥到手动涂抹并完全填充部件,渗透程度逐渐增加。16个样本显示就位不完全,除手动技术外,所有技术均出现这种情况。手动技术在外固定区域始终产生约3毫米厚的均匀骨水泥渗透。向髋臼杯中倒入任何骨水泥都会导致不同程度的更深渗透以及就位不完全的风险,这与骨坏死和早期骨折有关。