Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Santo Spirito In Sassia Hospital, Rome, Italy.
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Oct;25(7):1162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
In this in vitro study, 4 different resurfacing implants have been evaluated with a simulated femoral head: 2 types of cement have been used (low and high viscosity) and 2 different cementing techniques have been performed: direct (cement apposition directly on the femoral head) and indirect (cement poured into the femoral component). High-viscosity cement shows a homogeneous distribution all over the femoral head. Low-viscosity cement shows a massive polar concentration with insufficient if not absent distribution in the equatorial zone. Polar cement concentration could be held as a risk factor for early implant failure. It could have 2 effects on femoral head: biologic (excessive local exothermic reaction could cause necrosis of the osteocytes) and biomechanical (it could lead to uneven load distribution on the femoral head).
在这项体外研究中,我们评估了 4 种不同的表面处理植入物与模拟股骨头的关系:使用了 2 种不同的骨水泥(低粘度和高粘度),并采用了 2 种不同的骨水泥注入技术:直接(骨水泥直接涂抹在股骨头表面)和间接(将骨水泥注入股骨部件)。高粘度骨水泥在整个股骨头表面均匀分布。低粘度骨水泥则表现出明显的极性集中,在赤道区域分布不足甚至缺失。极性骨水泥的集中可能是导致早期植入物失败的一个危险因素。它可能对股骨头产生 2 种影响:生物力学(过度的局部放热反应可能导致成骨细胞坏死)和生物力学(可能导致股骨头受力分布不均匀)。