Mohindra R K
Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK.
J Med Ethics. 2007 Feb;33(2):71-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.016121.
This paper introduces the medical factual matrix as a new and potentially valuable tool in medical ethical analysis. Using this tool it demonstrates the idea that a defined medical intervention can only be meaningfully declared futile in relation to a defined goal(s) of treatment. It argues that a declaration of futility made solely in relation to a defined medical intervention is inchoate. It recasts the definition of goal futility as an intervention that cannot alter the probability of the existence of the important outcome states that might flow from a defined intervention. The idea of value futility and the extent of physician obligations in futile situations are also addressed. It also examines the source of substantive conflicts which commonly arise within the doctor-patient relationship and the ensuing power relations that operate between doctor and patient when questions of futility arise.
本文介绍了医学事实矩阵,将其作为医学伦理分析中一种新的且可能有价值的工具。通过使用该工具,本文论证了这样一种观点:特定的医疗干预只有相对于特定的治疗目标而言,才可能有意义地被判定为无效。本文认为,仅就特定的医疗干预做出的无效声明是不完整的。它将目标无效的定义重新表述为一种无法改变由特定干预可能产生的重要结果状态存在概率的干预。本文还探讨了价值无效的概念以及在无效情况下医生义务的范围。它还审视了医患关系中常见的实质性冲突的根源,以及当出现无效问题时医患之间随之产生的权力关系。