Magazzini Simone, Vanni Simone, Toccafondi Simone, Paladini Barbara, Zanobetti Maurizio, Giannazzo Giuseppe, Federico Roberto, Grifoni Stefano
Emergency Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;14(3):216-20. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.08.023. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
To evaluate the accuracy and safety of an emergency duplex ultrasound (EDUS) evaluation performed by emergency physicians in the emergency department.
Consecutive adult patients suspected of having their first episode of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) presenting to the emergency department were included in the study. All examinations were performed by emergency physicians trained with a 30-hour ultrasound course. Based on EDUS findings, patients were classified into one of three groups: normal, abnormal, and uncertain. Patients with abnormal and uncertain findings were initially treated as having a DVT. Patients with normal EDUS findings were discharged from the emergency department without anticoagulant therapy. A formal duplex ultrasound evaluation was repeated by a radiologist in all patients within 24-48 hours. Patients with normal findings on duplex ultrasound evaluation were followed up for symptomatic venous thromboembolism for up to one month.
A total of 399 patients were studied. The EDUS findings were normal in 301 (75%), abnormal in 90 (23%), and uncertain in eight (2%). All abnormal test results were confirmed by the formal duplex ultrasound evaluation, and three patients (0.8%) with uncertain findings on EDUS examination were subsequently diagnosed as having a distal DVT (positive predictive value, 95% [95% confidence interval, 92% to 95%]; negative predictive value, 100% [95% confidence interval = 99% to 100%]). No patients with normal findings on EDUS examination died or experienced venous thromboembolism at the one-month follow-up.
EDUS examination yielded a high negative predictive value and good positive predictive value, allowing rapid discharge and avoiding improper anticoagulant treatment.
评估急诊科急诊医生进行的急诊双功超声(EDUS)检查的准确性和安全性。
纳入连续就诊于急诊科、疑似首次发生深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的成年患者。所有检查均由接受过30小时超声课程培训的急诊医生进行。根据EDUS检查结果,患者被分为三组之一:正常、异常和不确定。检查结果异常和不确定的患者最初按DVT进行治疗。EDUS检查结果正常的患者在急诊科不接受抗凝治疗即出院。所有患者在24至48小时内由放射科医生重复进行正式的双功超声检查。双功超声检查结果正常的患者随访有症状的静脉血栓栓塞症长达1个月。
共研究了399例患者。EDUS检查结果正常的有301例(75%),异常的有90例(23%),不确定的有8例(2%)。所有异常检查结果均经正式的双功超声检查证实,EDUS检查结果不确定的3例患者(0.8%)随后被诊断为远端DVT(阳性预测值,95%[95%置信区间,92%至95%];阴性预测值,100%[95%置信区间 = 99%至100%])。EDUS检查结果正常的患者在1个月随访时无死亡或发生静脉血栓栓塞症。
EDUS检查具有较高的阴性预测值和良好的阳性预测值,可实现快速出院并避免不适当的抗凝治疗。