Javaudin François, Seon Julie, Le Bastard Quentin, Cabiot Astrid, Pes Philippe, Arnaudet Idriss, Allain Milena, Le Conte Philippe
Emergency Department, Departmental Hospital, La Roche Sur Yon, 44035, Nantes Cedex 01, France.
Emergency Department, University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Ultrasound J. 2020 Feb 3;12(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-0155-2.
Venous limited compression ultrasonography (VLCU) is recommended in case of suspicion of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Current training pathways are rather long and include experiential phase. This aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a short training session for VLCU without experiential phase. The training session was applied in residents without previous ultrasound skills. Program included operation of ultrasound device and interpretation of venous images. Included patients were older than 18 years and had a suspicion of DVT. After realization of VLCU using usual technique, residents reported the dynamic compressibility of the femoral and popliteal veins, the presence or not of a visible thrombus, self-reported difficulty and duration. Patients then underwent a whole leg ultrasonography (WLCU) in the local laboratory which was blinded to VLCU results. The main criterion was the negative-predictive value (NPV) of VLCU for the absence of proximal DVT diagnosed with WLCU. Secondary criteria were VLCU diagnostic performances, rate of inability to conclude, difficulty and duration. For a NPV of 95 ± 6%, the needed number of patients was 96. This study was approved by the ethical committee.
102 patients were analyzed. 46 residents were trained. A DVT was diagnosed by WLCU in 18 patients (prevalence of 17.6% [95% CI 11-26%]). VLCU detected 15 DVT (NPV of 96% [95% CI 89-99%]). The positive likelihood ratio was 9.9, the negative likelihood ratio 0.19 and Cohen's Kappa 0.62 [95% CI 0.52-0.71]. The sensitivity was 83% [CI 95% 60-94%] and specificity 88% [CI 95% 79-93%]. The mean number of VLCU by residents was 2.3 ± 2.1, median 2 (minimum 1, maximum 8). Mean duration was 3.4 min, difficulty was 3.7 ± 2.
The principal objective, NPV 96% [95% CI 89-99%], was achieved. However, this short training session was inadequate to allow ruling-out a DVT with sufficient security. Thus, the experiential phase seems to be essential.
怀疑存在深静脉血栓形成(DVT)时,推荐采用静脉有限压迫超声检查(VLCU)。目前的培训路径相当漫长,且包括经验积累阶段。本研究的目的是调查在无经验积累阶段的情况下进行VLCU短期培训的效果。该培训应用于此前无超声技能的住院医师。培训项目包括超声设备操作及静脉图像解读。纳入患者年龄大于18岁,且怀疑存在DVT。采用常规技术完成VLCU后,住院医师报告股静脉和腘静脉的动态可压缩性、有无可见血栓、自我报告的困难程度及检查时长。然后患者在当地实验室接受全腿超声检查(WLCU),该检查对VLCU结果不知情。主要标准是VLCU对经WLCU诊断无近端DVT的阴性预测值(NPV)。次要标准包括VLCU的诊断性能、无法得出结论的比例、困难程度及检查时长。对于NPV为95±6%,所需患者数量为96例。本研究经伦理委员会批准。
分析了102例患者。46名住院医师接受了培训。经WLCU诊断18例患者存在DVT(患病率为17.6%[95%CI 11 - 26%])。VLCU检测到15例DVT(NPV为96%[95%CI 89 - 99%])。阳性似然比为9.9,阴性似然比为0.19,Cohen's Kappa为0.62[95%CI 0.52 - 0.71]。敏感性为83%[CI 95% 60 - 94%],特异性为88%[CI 95% 79 - 93%]。住院医师进行VLCU的平均次数为2.3±2.1次,中位数为2次(最小值1次,最大值8次)。平均时长为3.4分钟,困难程度评分为3.7±2分。
实现了主要目标,NPV为96%[95%CI 89 - 99%]。然而,这种短期培训不足以安全地排除DVT。因此,经验积累阶段似乎至关重要。