• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病足溃疡临床体征与症状检查表的评分者间信度

The inter-rater reliability of the Clinical Signs and Symptoms Checklist in diabetic foot ulcers.

作者信息

Gardner Sue E, Frantz Rita A, Park Heeok, Scherubel Melody

机构信息

Center for Research in the Implementation of Innovative Strategies in Practice (CRIISP), Iowa City VA Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007 Jan;53(1):46-51.

PMID:17264355
Abstract

The Clinical Signs and Symptoms Checklist is a tool designed to measure 12 clinical signs and symptoms of localized chronic wound infection. Since its initial development, this Checklist has been revised to include sanguineous drainage. To examine the inter-rater reliability of the revised Clinical Signs and Symptoms Checklist in diabetic foot ulcers, an observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in conjunction with a larger study examining the validity of each sign and symptom for identifying infection in diabetic foot ulcers. Two independent nurse observers assessed 64 diabetic foot ulcers in 64 patients using the Checklist. The reliability of each item was calculated using percent agreement and the Kappa coefficient. Total percent agreement ranged from 76% to 100%, and Kappa statistics ranged from .34 to 1.00. Study findings confirm that the Clinical Signs and Symptoms Checklist is a reliable tool for identifying the clinical signs and symptoms of localized infection in diabetic foot ulcers.

摘要

临床体征和症状检查表是一种用于测量局部慢性伤口感染的12种临床体征和症状的工具。自最初开发以来,该检查表已进行修订,纳入了血性引流情况。为了检验修订后的临床体征和症状检查表在糖尿病足溃疡患者中的评分者间信度,我们开展了一项观察性横断面研究,该研究与另一项规模更大的研究同时进行,后者旨在检验每种体征和症状在识别糖尿病足溃疡感染方面的有效性。两名独立的护士观察者使用该检查表对64例患者的64个糖尿病足溃疡进行了评估。使用一致率和kappa系数计算每个条目的信度。总一致率在76%至100%之间,kappa统计量在0.34至1.00之间。研究结果证实,临床体征和症状检查表是识别糖尿病足溃疡局部感染临床体征和症状的可靠工具。

相似文献

1
The inter-rater reliability of the Clinical Signs and Symptoms Checklist in diabetic foot ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡临床体征与症状检查表的评分者间信度
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007 Jan;53(1):46-51.
2
A tool to assess clinical signs and symptoms of localized infection in chronic wounds: development and reliability.一种评估慢性伤口局部感染临床体征和症状的工具:开发与可靠性
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2001 Jan;47(1):40-7.
3
The validity of the clinical signs and symptoms used to identify localized chronic wound infection.用于识别局部慢性伤口感染的临床体征和症状的有效性。
Wound Repair Regen. 2001 May-Jun;9(3):178-86. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00178.x.
4
Recognising infection in wounds.识别伤口感染
Nurs Stand. 2008;23(7):53-4, 56, 58 passim. doi: 10.7748/ns2008.10.23.7.53.c6712.
5
The inter-rater reliability between nurse-assessors clinically assessing infection of chronic wounds using the WUWHS criteria.临床评估师使用 WUWHS 标准评估慢性伤口感染时的组内一致性。
Int Wound J. 2018 Feb;15(1):8-15. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12785. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
6
Inter- and intra-observer (dis)agreement among nurses and doctors to classify colour and exudation of open surgical wounds according to the Red-Yellow-Black scheme.护士和医生之间以及观察者内部对于根据红-黄-黑分类法对开放性手术伤口的颜色和渗出物进行分类的(不)一致性。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jul;16(7):1270-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01789.x.
7
Defined and refined: criteria for identifying wound infection revisited.
Br J Community Nurs. 2004 Mar;9(3):S6-15. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2004.9.Sup1.12495.
8
Criteria for identifying wound infection--revisited.伤口感染的识别标准——再探讨。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2005 Jan;51(1):28-34.
9
Evaluation of a new silver foam dressing in patients with critically colonised venous leg ulcers.对新的泡沫银敷料用于严重定植的下肢静脉溃疡患者的评估。
J Wound Care. 2007 Mar;16(3):129-32. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2007.16.3.27015.
10
The pH of wound fluid in diabetic foot ulcers -- the way forward in detecting clinical infection?
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2014 May;10(3):177-81. doi: 10.2174/1573399810666140609143217.

引用本文的文献

1
Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification of DNA (LAMP) as an Alternative Method for Determining Bacteria in Wound Infections.DNA 的环介导等温扩增(LAMP)作为一种替代方法,用于确定伤口感染中的细菌。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 28;25(1):411. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010411.
2
Is my wound infected? A study on the use of hyperspectral imaging to assess wound infection.我的伤口感染了吗?一项关于使用高光谱成像评估伤口感染的研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 24;10:1165281. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1165281. eCollection 2023.
3
Use of fluorescence imaging to optimize location of tissue sampling in hard-to-heal wounds.
利用荧光成象技术优化难以愈合伤口的组织取样位置。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jan 12;12:1070311. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1070311. eCollection 2022.
4
Reliance on Clinical Signs and Symptoms Assessment Leads to Misuse of Antimicrobials: Analysis of 350 Chronic Wounds.仅凭临床体征和症状评估会导致抗菌药物的滥用:350 例慢性创面分析。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2022 Dec;11(12):639-649. doi: 10.1089/wound.2021.0146. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
5
Are Semi-Quantitative Clinical Cultures Inadequate? Comparison to Quantitative Analysis of 1053 Bacterial Isolates from 350 Wounds.半定量临床培养是否不足?与350处伤口的1053株细菌分离株定量分析的比较。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 12;11(7):1239. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071239.
6
Validating the probe-to-bone test and other tests for diagnosing chronic osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot.验证探针到骨试验和其他用于诊断糖尿病足慢性骨髓炎的试验。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Oct;33(10):2140-5. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2309. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
7
Clinical signs of infection in diabetic foot ulcers with high microbial load.高微生物负荷的糖尿病足溃疡的感染临床体征。
Biol Res Nurs. 2009 Oct;11(2):119-28. doi: 10.1177/1099800408326169.
8
Minimising wound-related pain at dressing change: evidence-informed practice.在换药时将伤口相关疼痛降至最低:循证实践。
Int Wound J. 2008 Jun;5(2):144-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00486.x.
9
Wound bed preparation and oxygen balance--a new component?伤口床准备与氧平衡——一个新要素?
Int Wound J. 2007 Sep;4 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):9-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00388.x.