Skopp Nancy A, Edens John F, Ruiz Mark A
Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2007 Feb;88(1):106-17. doi: 10.1080/00223890709336841.
Although widely researched in male offender samples, relatively little is known about the clinical utility of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI; Morey, 1991) among female prisoners. In this study, we examined the utility of various theoretically relevant PAI scales to predict 3 types of institutional misconduct (general, aggressive/defiant, and covert infractions) in a sample of 113 female inmates incarcerated for at least 1 year. The Antisocial Features (ANT) scale was the most consistent and effective predictor of misbehavior, with limited evidence to suggest that other PAI scales could demonstrate any incremental validity beyond this measure. More important, ANT continued to be associated with institutional misconduct even after controlling for criminal background variables such as prior convictions and a history of violence.
尽管在男性罪犯样本中已得到广泛研究,但对于人格评估量表(PAI;莫雷,1991)在女性囚犯中的临床效用却知之甚少。在本研究中,我们检验了各种理论上相关的PAI量表在预测113名被监禁至少一年的女性囚犯的3种机构不当行为(一般、攻击/违抗和隐蔽违规)方面的效用。反社会特征(ANT)量表是行为不端最一致且有效的预测指标,仅有有限的证据表明其他PAI量表在此指标之外还能显示出任何增量效度。更重要的是,即使在控制了诸如前科和暴力史等犯罪背景变量之后,ANT仍然与机构不当行为相关。