Valovich McLeod Tamara C, Barr William B, McCrea Michael, Guskiewicz Kevin M
Arizona School of Health Sciences, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ, USA.
J Athl Train. 2006 Oct-Dec;41(4):399-408.
Establishing psychometric and measurement properties of concussion assessments is important before these assessments are used by clinicians. To date, data have been limited regarding these issues with respect to neurocognitive and postural stability testing, especially in a younger athletic population.
To determine the test-retest reliability and reliable change indices of concussion assessments in athletes participating in youth sports. A secondary objective was to determine the relationship between the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) and neuropsychological assessments in young athletes.
We used a repeated-measures design to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the concussion assessments in young athletes. Correlations were calculated to determine the relationship between the measures. All subjects underwent 2 test sessions 60 days apart.
Sports medicine laboratory and school or home environment.
Fifty healthy young athletes between the ages of 9 and 14 years.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Scores from the SAC, Balance Error Scoring System, Buschke Selective Reminding Test, Trail Making Test B, and Coding and Symbol Search subsets of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children were used in the analysis.
Our test-retest indices for each of the 6 scores were poor to good, ranging from r = .46 to .83. Good reliability was found for the Coding and Symbol Search tests. The reliable change scores provided a way of determining a meaningful change in score for each assessment. We found a weak relationship ( r < .36) between the SAC and each of the neuropsychological assessments; however, stronger relationships ( r > .70) were found between certain neuropsychological measures.
We found moderate test-retest reliability on the cognitive tests that assessed attention, concentration, and visual processing and the Balance Error Scoring System. Our results demonstrated only a weak relationship between performance on the SAC and the selected neuropsychological tests, so it is likely that these tests assess somewhat different areas of cognitive function. Our correlational findings provide more evidence for using the SAC along with a more complex neuropsychological assessment battery in the evaluation of concussion in young athletes.
在临床医生使用脑震荡评估方法之前,确定其心理测量学和测量属性非常重要。迄今为止,关于神经认知和姿势稳定性测试在这些问题上的数据有限,尤其是在较年轻的运动员群体中。
确定参加青少年体育活动的运动员脑震荡评估的重测信度和可靠变化指数。第二个目的是确定年轻运动员的脑震荡标准化评估(SAC)与神经心理学评估之间的关系。
我们采用重复测量设计来评估年轻运动员脑震荡评估的重测信度。计算相关性以确定各项测量之间的关系。所有受试者相隔60天接受2次测试。
运动医学实验室以及学校或家庭环境。
50名年龄在9至14岁之间的健康年轻运动员。
分析中使用了SAC、平衡误差评分系统、布施克选择性提醒测试、连线测验B以及韦氏儿童智力量表的编码和符号搜索子测验的分数。
我们对6项分数中每项的重测指数从差到好不等,范围为r = 0.46至0.83。编码和符号搜索测试具有良好的信度。可靠变化分数提供了一种确定每次评估中分数有意义变化的方法。我们发现SAC与每项神经心理学评估之间的关系较弱(r < 0.36);然而,某些神经心理学测量之间发现了较强的关系(r > 0.70)。
我们发现,在评估注意力、专注力和视觉处理能力的认知测试以及平衡误差评分系统方面,重测信度中等。我们的结果表明,SAC表现与所选神经心理学测试之间的关系仅很弱,因此这些测试可能评估的是认知功能的不同方面。我们的相关性研究结果为在评估年轻运动员脑震荡时将SAC与更复杂的神经心理学评估组合一起使用提供了更多证据。