Broglio Steven P, Ferrara Michael S, Macciocchi Stephen N, Baumgartner Ted A, Elliott Ronald
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, 906 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
J Athl Train. 2007 Oct-Dec;42(4):509-14.
Computer-based neurocognitive assessment programs commonly are used to assist in concussion diagnosis and management. These tests have been adopted readily by many clinicians based on existing test-retest reliability data provided by test developers.
To examine the test-retest reliability of 3 commercially available computer-based neurocognitive assessments using clinically relevant time frames.
Repeated-measures design.
Research laboratory.
118 healthy student volunteers.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The participants completed the ImPACT, Concussion Sentinel, and Headminder Concussion Resolution Index tests on 3 days: baseline, day 45, and day 50. Each participant also completed the Green Memory and Concentration Test to evaluate effort. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for all output scores generated by each computer program as an estimate of test-retest reliability.
The intraclass correlation coefficient estimates from baseline to day 45 assessments ranged from .15 to .39 on the ImPACT, .23 to .65 on the Concussion Sentinel, and .15 to .66 on the Concussion Resolution Index. The intraclass correlation coefficient estimates from the day 45 to day 50 assessments ranged from .39 to .61 on the ImPACT, .39 to .66 on the Concussion Sentinel, and .03 to .66 on the Concussion Resolution Index. All participants demonstrated high levels of effort on all days of testing, according to Memory and Concentration Test interpretive guidelines.
Three contemporary computer-based concussion assessment programs evidenced low to moderate test-retest reliability coefficients. Our findings do not appear to be due to suboptimal effort or other factors related to poor test performance, because persons identified by individual programs as having poor baseline data were excluded from the analyses. The neurocognitive evaluation should continue to be part of a multifaceted concussion assessment program, with priority given to those scores showing the highest reliability.
基于计算机的神经认知评估程序通常用于辅助脑震荡的诊断和管理。基于测试开发者提供的现有重测信度数据,许多临床医生已欣然采用这些测试。
使用临床相关时间框架来检验3种市售基于计算机的神经认知评估的重测信度。
重复测量设计。
研究实验室。
118名健康学生志愿者。
参与者在3天内完成了ImPACT、脑震荡哨兵和脑震荡恢复指数测试:基线、第45天和第50天。每位参与者还完成了绿色记忆和注意力测试以评估努力程度。计算每个计算机程序生成的所有输出分数的组内相关系数,作为重测信度的估计值。
从基线到第45天评估的组内相关系数估计值在ImPACT上为0.15至0.39,在脑震荡哨兵上为0.23至0.65,在脑震荡恢复指数上为0.15至0.66。从第45天到第50天评估的组内相关系数估计值在ImPACT上为0.39至0.61,在脑震荡哨兵上为0.39至0.66,在脑震荡恢复指数上为0.03至0.66。根据记忆和注意力测试解释指南,所有参与者在测试的所有日子里都表现出高度的努力程度。
三种当代基于计算机的脑震荡评估程序的重测信度系数较低至中等。我们的研究结果似乎并非由于努力程度欠佳或与测试表现不佳相关的其他因素,因为被个别程序认定为基线数据不佳的人员被排除在分析之外。神经认知评估应继续作为多方面脑震荡评估程序的一部分,优先考虑那些显示出最高信度的分数。