Guskiewicz Kevin M., Ross Scott E., Marshall Stephen W.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
J Athl Train. 2001 Sep;36(3):263-273.
Postural stability and neuropsychological testing are gradually becoming integral parts of postconcussion assessment in athletes. Clinicians, however, sometimes question the viability of instituting preseason baseline testing and the value of these results in making return-to-play decisions. Our purpose was to examine the course of recovery on various postural stability and neuropsychological measures after sport-related concussion. A secondary goal was to determine if loss of consciousness and amnesia, both of which are heavily weighted in most of the concussion classification systems, affect the rate of recovery. DESIGN AND SETTING: All subjects underwent a battery of baseline postural stability and neuropsychological tests before the start of their respective seasons. Any athletes subsequently injured were followed up at postinjury days 1, 3, and 5. Matched control subjects were assessed using the same test battery at the same time intervals. SUBJECTS: We studied 36 Division I collegiate athletes who sustained a concussion and 36 matched control subjects. MEASUREMENTS: We assessed postural stability using the Sensory Organization Test on the NeuroCom Smart Balance Master System and the Balance Error Scoring System. Neurocognitive functioning was measured with several neuropsychological tests: Trail-Making Test, Wechsler Digit Span Test, Stroop Color Word Test, and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test. RESULTS: Injured subjects demonstrated postural stability deficits, as measured on both the Sensory Organization Test and Balance Error Scoring System. These deficits were significantly worse than both preseason scores and matched control subjects' scores on postinjury day 1. Only the results on the Trail-Making Test B and Wechsler Digit Span Test Backward resulted in a logical recovery curve that could explain lowered neuropsychological performance due to concussive injury. Significant differences were revealed between the control and injured groups at day 1 postinjury, but a significant decline between baseline and postinjury scores was not demonstrated. Loss of consciousness and amnesia were not associated with increased deficits or slowed recovery on measures of postural stability or neurocognitive functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Athletes with cerebral concussion demonstrated acute balance deficits, which are likely the result of not using information from the vestibular and visual systems effectively. Neurocognitive deficits are more difficult to identify in the acute stages of concussion, although concentration, working memory, immediate memory recall, and rapid visual processing appear to be mildly affected. More research is necessary to determine the best neuropsychological test battery for assessing sport-related concussion.
姿势稳定性和神经心理学测试正逐渐成为运动员脑震荡后评估的重要组成部分。然而,临床医生有时会质疑进行季前基线测试的可行性以及这些结果在做出重返赛场决策方面的价值。我们的目的是研究与运动相关的脑震荡后各种姿势稳定性和神经心理学指标的恢复过程。第二个目标是确定意识丧失和失忆(这两者在大多数脑震荡分类系统中权重较大)是否会影响恢复速度。
所有受试者在各自赛季开始前都接受了一系列基线姿势稳定性和神经心理学测试。随后受伤的任何运动员在受伤后第1天、第3天和第5天接受随访。匹配的对照受试者在相同时间间隔使用相同的测试组合进行评估。
我们研究了36名发生脑震荡的美国大学体育总会(NCAA)一级联赛大学生运动员和36名匹配的对照受试者。
我们使用NeuroCom智能平衡大师系统上的感觉统合测试和平衡误差评分系统评估姿势稳定性。用几种神经心理学测试测量神经认知功能:连线测验、韦氏数字广度测验、斯特鲁普色词测验和霍普金斯言语学习测验。
在感觉统合测试和平衡误差评分系统上的测量结果显示,受伤受试者存在姿势稳定性缺陷。这些缺陷在受伤后第1天明显比季前得分和匹配对照受试者的得分更差。只有连线测验B和韦氏数字广度测验倒序的结果呈现出符合逻辑的恢复曲线,能够解释因脑震荡损伤导致的神经心理学表现下降。受伤后第1天,对照组和受伤组之间存在显著差异,但未显示基线得分和受伤后得分之间有显著下降。意识丧失和失忆与姿势稳定性或神经认知功能测量指标上的缺陷增加或恢复减慢无关。
脑震荡运动员表现出急性平衡缺陷,这可能是没有有效利用来自前庭和视觉系统信息的结果。在脑震荡急性期更难识别神经认知缺陷,尽管注意力、工作记忆、即时记忆回忆和快速视觉处理似乎受到轻度影响。需要更多研究来确定评估与运动相关脑震荡的最佳神经心理学测试组合。