Bahlmann Jörg, Rodriguez-Fornells Antoni, Rotte Michael, Münte Thomas F
Department of Neuropsychology, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Oct;28(10):940-9. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20318.
Understanding a complex sentence requires the processing of information at different (e.g., phonological, semantic, and syntactic) levels, the intermediate storage of this information and the unification of this information to compute the meaning of the sentence information. The present investigation homed in on two aspects of sentence processing: working memory and reanalysis. Event-related functional MRI was used in 12 healthy native speakers of German, while they read sentences. Half of the sentences had unambiguous initial noun-phrases (masculine nominative, masculine accusative) and thus signaled subject-first (canonical) or object-first (noncanonical) sentences. Noncanonical unambiguous sentences were supposed to entail greater demand on working memory, because of their more complex syntactic structure. The other half of the sentences had case-ambiguous initial noun-phrases (feminine gender). Only the second unambiguous noun-phrase (eighth position in the sentences) revealed, whether a canonical or noncanonical word order was present. Based on previous data it was hypothesized that ambiguous noncanonical sentences required a recomputation of the sentence, as subjects would initially commit to a subject first reading. In the respective contrasts two main areas of brain activation were observed. Unambiguous noncanonical sentences elicited more activation in left inferior frontal cortex relative unambiguous canonical sentences. This was interpreted in conjunction with the greater demands on working memory in the former condition. For noncanonical ambiguous relative to canonical ambiguous sentences, an activation of the left supramarginal gyrus was revealed, which was interpreted as a reflection of the reanalysis-requirements induced by this condition.
理解一个复杂句子需要在不同层面(如语音、语义和句法)处理信息,对这些信息进行中间存储,并将这些信息整合起来以计算句子信息的含义。本研究聚焦于句子处理的两个方面:工作记忆和重新分析。对12名以德语为母语的健康受试者进行事件相关功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究,让他们阅读句子。一半的句子具有明确的初始名词短语(阳性主格、阳性宾格),因此表明是主语优先(规范)或宾语优先(非规范)句子。非规范的明确句子被认为对工作记忆有更高要求,因为其句法结构更复杂。另一半句子的初始名词短语(阴性)存在格的歧义。只有第二个明确的名词短语(句子中的第八个位置)才能揭示句子是规范语序还是非规范语序。基于先前的数据推测,歧义非规范句子需要对句子进行重新计算,因为受试者最初会倾向于先读主语。在各自的对比中观察到两个主要的脑激活区域。与明确的规范句子相比,明确的非规范句子在左下额叶皮层引发更多激活。结合前一种情况下对工作记忆的更高要求来解释这一现象。相对于规范歧义句子,非规范歧义句子激活了左缘上回,这被解释为该条件下重新分析需求的反映。