Suppr超能文献

一项关于德语中规范语序和非规范语序的功能磁共振成像研究。

An fMRI study of canonical and noncanonical word order in German.

作者信息

Bahlmann Jörg, Rodriguez-Fornells Antoni, Rotte Michael, Münte Thomas F

机构信息

Department of Neuropsychology, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Oct;28(10):940-9. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20318.

Abstract

Understanding a complex sentence requires the processing of information at different (e.g., phonological, semantic, and syntactic) levels, the intermediate storage of this information and the unification of this information to compute the meaning of the sentence information. The present investigation homed in on two aspects of sentence processing: working memory and reanalysis. Event-related functional MRI was used in 12 healthy native speakers of German, while they read sentences. Half of the sentences had unambiguous initial noun-phrases (masculine nominative, masculine accusative) and thus signaled subject-first (canonical) or object-first (noncanonical) sentences. Noncanonical unambiguous sentences were supposed to entail greater demand on working memory, because of their more complex syntactic structure. The other half of the sentences had case-ambiguous initial noun-phrases (feminine gender). Only the second unambiguous noun-phrase (eighth position in the sentences) revealed, whether a canonical or noncanonical word order was present. Based on previous data it was hypothesized that ambiguous noncanonical sentences required a recomputation of the sentence, as subjects would initially commit to a subject first reading. In the respective contrasts two main areas of brain activation were observed. Unambiguous noncanonical sentences elicited more activation in left inferior frontal cortex relative unambiguous canonical sentences. This was interpreted in conjunction with the greater demands on working memory in the former condition. For noncanonical ambiguous relative to canonical ambiguous sentences, an activation of the left supramarginal gyrus was revealed, which was interpreted as a reflection of the reanalysis-requirements induced by this condition.

摘要

理解一个复杂句子需要在不同层面(如语音、语义和句法)处理信息,对这些信息进行中间存储,并将这些信息整合起来以计算句子信息的含义。本研究聚焦于句子处理的两个方面:工作记忆和重新分析。对12名以德语为母语的健康受试者进行事件相关功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究,让他们阅读句子。一半的句子具有明确的初始名词短语(阳性主格、阳性宾格),因此表明是主语优先(规范)或宾语优先(非规范)句子。非规范的明确句子被认为对工作记忆有更高要求,因为其句法结构更复杂。另一半句子的初始名词短语(阴性)存在格的歧义。只有第二个明确的名词短语(句子中的第八个位置)才能揭示句子是规范语序还是非规范语序。基于先前的数据推测,歧义非规范句子需要对句子进行重新计算,因为受试者最初会倾向于先读主语。在各自的对比中观察到两个主要的脑激活区域。与明确的规范句子相比,明确的非规范句子在左下额叶皮层引发更多激活。结合前一种情况下对工作记忆的更高要求来解释这一现象。相对于规范歧义句子,非规范歧义句子激活了左缘上回,这被解释为该条件下重新分析需求的反映。

相似文献

1
An fMRI study of canonical and noncanonical word order in German.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Oct;28(10):940-9. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20318.
2
Native and non-native reading of sentences: an fMRI experiment.
Neuroimage. 2006 May 15;31(1):354-65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.047. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
4
Neural aspects of sentence comprehension: syntactic complexity, reversibility, and reanalysis.
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Aug;20(8):1853-64. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp249. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
6
Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing.
Neuroimage. 2006 May 1;30(4):1414-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.002. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
7
Functional segregation of cortical language areas by sentence repetition.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 May;27(5):360-71. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20250.
8
Activations of "motor" and other non-language structures during sentence comprehension.
Brain Lang. 2004 May;89(2):290-9. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00359-6.
9
Imagery in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study.
Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):112-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.042.
10
The role of the IFG and pSTS in syntactic prediction: Evidence from a parametric study of hierarchical structure in fMRI.
Cortex. 2017 Mar;88:106-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinct neural correlates of morphosyntactic and thematic comprehension processes in aphasia.
Brain Commun. 2025 Mar 24;7(2):fcaf093. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf093. eCollection 2025.
2
Differential Tracking of Linguistic vs. Mental State Content in Naturalistic Stimuli by Language and Theory of Mind (ToM) Brain Networks.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Jul 14;3(3):413-440. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00071. eCollection 2022.
3
Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Processing of Complex Sentences: An fMRI Study.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020 Jun 1;1(2):226-248. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00011. eCollection 2020.
4
The Unfolding of Cognitive Effort During Sentence Processing: Pupillometric Evidence From People With and Without Aphasia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Dec 13;64(12):4900-4917. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00129. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
Expecting Questions Modulates Cognitive Effort in a Syntactic Processing Task: Evidence From Pupillometry.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Jan 14;64(1):121-133. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00071. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
6
Neural networks for sentence comprehension and production: An ALE-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Jun 1;40(8):2275-2304. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24523. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
Functional organization of the language network in three- and six-year-old children.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Apr;98:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.014. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
9
Preschoolers' brains rely on semantic cues prior to the mastery of syntax during sentence comprehension.
Neuroimage. 2016 Feb 1;126:256-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.036. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
10
Development of a selective left-hemispheric fronto-temporal network for processing syntactic complexity in language comprehension.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Mar;83:274-282. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Summer;7(3):376-95. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.376.
2
On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Sep;9(9):416-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004.
3
Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension.
Neuroimage. 2005 May 15;26(1):221-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.032.
4
An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Feb;22(2):241-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.002.
5
Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Nov;16(9):1562-75. doi: 10.1162/0898929042568479.
6
Event-related brain potential studies in language.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2004 Nov;4(6):466-70. doi: 10.1007/s11910-004-0070-0.
7
Processing local transitions versus long-distance syntactic hierarchies.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jun;8(6):245-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.013.
8
How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing.
Neuroimage. 2003 Nov;20 Suppl 1:S18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.013.
10
Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):117-29. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00086-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验