Suppr超能文献

莫西沙星或大环内酯类药物用于慢性支气管炎急性加重期的真实治疗情况:一项在全科医疗中的上市后比较监测研究

Real-life treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis with moxifloxacin or macrolides: a comparative post-marketing surveillance study in general practice.

作者信息

Schaberg T, Möller M, File T, Stauch K, Landen H

机构信息

Zentrum für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Unterstedt, Unterstedt, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2006;26(12):733-44. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200626120-00007.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the real-life treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECBs) using moxifloxacin tablets or one of the oral macrolides azithromycin, clarithromycin or roxithromycin in terms of symptom relief, time until improvement and cure, overall efficacy and tolerability.

METHODS

This prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study included out-patients with AECB whose last exacerbation was treated with a macrolide. The current AECB was treated either with moxifloxacin or with one of the macrolides azithromycin, clarithromycin or roxithromycin. Data were obtained on the patient's characteristics, disease and treatment history, the course of the current AECB including time to improvement and cure, and the final assessments of efficacy and tolerability. All adverse events were recorded in patients treated with moxifloxacin; for patients receiving macrolides, only drug-related adverse events were reported.

RESULTS

464 physicians treated 904 patients with moxifloxacin and 846 patients with one of the macrolides. Age, sex and body mass index were well matched between the two treatment groups. However, more moxifloxacin than macrolide patients presented with a generally bad condition (62.8% vs 48.6%). About 42% of patients in both groups had had chronic bronchitis for 1-5 years, and about 27% for 5-10 years. The mean number of AECBs in the previous 12 months was 2.7 and 2.6, respectively. Moxifloxacin was administered to most patients for 5 (43.8%) or 7 days (42.4%). Patients in the macrolide group were treated in most cases with clarithromycin 500 mg for 4-7 days, roxithromycin 300 mg for 6-7 days or azithromycin 500 mg for 3 days. Physicians assessed overall efficacy and tolerability as 'very good' or 'good' in 96.1% and 98.1%, respectively, of moxifloxacin-treated patients and in 67.5% and 91.7%, respectively, of macrolide-treated patients. The mean duration until improvement and cure of AECB was 3.2 days (+/- SD 1.5) and 6.2 days (+/- 2.6) in moxifloxacin-treated patients compared with 4.5 days (+/- 1.8) and 7.5 days (+/- 3.0) in macrolide-treated patients (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study conducted under real-life treatment conditions in patients with AECBs who were previously treated with a macrolide showed faster symptom relief and higher recovery rates with moxifloxacin compared with macrolides. The two treatment groups had comparably good safety and tolerability profiles.

摘要

目的

比较莫西沙星片与口服大环内酯类药物阿奇霉素、克拉霉素或罗红霉素在慢性支气管炎急性加重期(AECB)实际治疗中的症状缓解情况、改善和治愈时间、总体疗效及耐受性。

方法

这项前瞻性、非干预性、多中心研究纳入了AECB门诊患者,其上次加重期接受过大环内酯类药物治疗。本次AECB治疗采用莫西沙星或大环内酯类药物阿奇霉素、克拉霉素或罗红霉素中的一种。收集患者的特征、疾病和治疗史、当前AECB的病程(包括改善和治愈时间)以及疗效和耐受性的最终评估数据。记录所有接受莫西沙星治疗患者的不良事件;对于接受大环内酯类药物治疗的患者,仅报告与药物相关的不良事件。

结果

464名医生用莫西沙星治疗了904例患者,用大环内酯类药物治疗了846例患者。两个治疗组的年龄、性别和体重指数匹配良好。然而,与大环内酯类药物治疗的患者相比,莫西沙星治疗的患者中病情普遍较差的更多(62.8%对48.6%)。两组中约42%的患者患慢性支气管炎1 - 5年,约27%的患者患5 - 10年。前12个月AECB的平均发作次数分别为2.7次和2.6次。大多数患者使用莫西沙星治疗5天(43.8%)或7天(42.4%)。大环内酯类药物组的患者大多数情况下使用500 mg克拉霉素治疗4 - 7天、300 mg罗红霉素治疗6 - 7天或500 mg阿奇霉素治疗3天。医生对莫西沙星治疗患者的总体疗效和耐受性评估为“非常好”或“好”的分别为96.1%和98.1%,对大环内酯类药物治疗患者的评估分别为67.5%和91.7%。莫西沙星治疗患者AECB改善和治愈的平均时间为3.2天(±标准差1.5)和6.2天(±2.6),而大环内酯类药物治疗患者分别为4.5天(±1.8)和7.5天(±3.0)(p < 0.0001)。

结论

在实际治疗条件下,对先前接受过大环内酯类药物治疗的AECB患者进行的这项研究结果表明,与大环内酯类药物相比,莫西沙星症状缓解更快,治愈率更高。两个治疗组的安全性和耐受性相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验