Suppr超能文献

五种CA 19-9自动化检测方法的性能特征

Performance characteristics of five automated CA 19-9 assays.

作者信息

La'ulu Sonia L, Roberts William L

机构信息

ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2007 Mar;127(3):436-40. doi: 10.1309/H52VET3M6P7GYWG1.

Abstract

Serum concentrations of cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 can be useful in monitoring response to therapy in pancreatic cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate 5 automated CA 19-9 assays: ARCHITECT 12000 (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL), ADVIA Centaur (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY), UniCel Dxl 800 (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA), IMMULITE 2000 (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA), and Elecsys E170 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). All methods were evaluated for limit of detection, linearity, imprecision, method comparison, and reference intervals. Limit of detection results were all below 2.0 kU/L and met the manufacturers' claims. Linearity had deviation from target values that ranged from 4.5% to 26.7%. All methods showed acceptable imprecision with total coefficients of variation less than 8%. Method comparison by Passing-Bablok analysis resulted in slopes ranging from 1.00 to 2.06 and correlation coefficients of 0.85 to 0.98. Between 97.6% and 99.2% of results from healthy volunteers were less than 35 kU/L. All methods show acceptable analytic performance.

摘要

血清癌抗原(CA)19-9浓度可用于监测胰腺癌的治疗反应。本研究的目的是评估5种CA 19-9自动化检测方法:ARCHITECT 12000(雅培诊断公司,伊利诺伊州雅培公园)、ADVIA Centaur(拜耳诊断公司,纽约塔里敦)、UniCel Dxl 800(贝克曼库尔特公司,加利福尼亚州富勒顿)、IMMULITE 2000(诊断产品公司,加利福尼亚州洛杉矶)和Elecsys E170(罗氏诊断公司,印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯)。对所有方法进行了检测限、线性、不精密度、方法比较和参考区间的评估。检测限结果均低于2.0 kU/L,符合制造商的声明。线性度与目标值的偏差范围为4.5%至26.7%。所有方法均显示出可接受的不精密度,总变异系数小于8%。通过Passing-Bablok分析进行的方法比较得出斜率范围为1.00至2.06,相关系数为从0.85至0.98。健康志愿者97.6%至99.2%的检测结果低于35 kU/L。所有方法均显示出可接受的分析性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验