de Jong Frank M W, de Snoo Geert R, van de Zande Jan C
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
J Environ Manage. 2008 Mar;86(4):721-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.031. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
This study estimated the potential effects of pesticide drift on terrestrial ecosystems outside target areas, for the Dutch situation. A series of field trials was conducted to estimate the effects of drift on different species groups at different distances from a treated plot for different categories of pesticide: herbicides, fungicides and insecticides. Measurements of the pesticide drift deposition resulting from standard agricultural practice were used to model deposition outside the treated area. These data were then combined with national statistics on cropland and pesticide use to assess the ecological effects of pesticide drift for the Netherlands as a whole. Three scenarios were considered: the recent past (1998), the present (2005) and an optimised scenario based on 'best available practice' (2010). In the recent past the impact of herbicide drift on sensitive life stages non-target vascular plants is estimated to have exceeded the 50% effect level on 59% of adjacent linear landscape elements such as ditch banks and hedgerows. For the impact of insecticides and fungicides on non-target insects and fungi this 50% effect figure was 29% and 28% of linear elements, respectively. In the present situation, with (narrow) unsprayed buffer zones and other measures in place, these percentages are down to 41% for herbicides, 21% for insecticides and 14% for fungicides. In the optimised scenario, with a greater buffer width of 2.25m for potatoes (compared to 1.50m in 2005) and 1m for other crops (compared to 0.25 and 0.5m in 2005) and 'best available practice', these percentages can be cut to zero. In natural areas located within farming regions the 10% effect level can be reduced from 31% of such areas (1998) to 0% under conditions of 'best available practice'.
本研究针对荷兰的情况,估算了农药漂移对目标区域以外陆地生态系统的潜在影响。开展了一系列田间试验,以估算不同类别农药(除草剂、杀菌剂和杀虫剂)在距施药地块不同距离处对不同物种群的漂移影响。采用标准农业操作导致的农药漂移沉积测量数据,对施药区域以外的沉积情况进行建模。然后,将这些数据与全国耕地和农药使用统计数据相结合,以评估农药漂移对整个荷兰的生态影响。考虑了三种情景:近期(1998年)、当前(2005年)以及基于“最佳可行做法”的优化情景(2010年)。在近期,除草剂漂移对非目标维管植物敏感生命阶段的影响估计超过了50%的影响水平,在59%的相邻线性景观要素(如沟渠堤岸和树篱)上出现这种情况。对于杀虫剂和杀菌剂对非目标昆虫和真菌的影响,这一50%的影响数字分别为线性要素的29%和28%。在当前情况下,由于设置了(狭窄的)未喷洒缓冲区及其他措施,这些百分比分别降至除草剂的41%、杀虫剂的21%和杀菌剂的14%。在优化情景下,土豆的缓冲区宽度增加至2.25米(2005年为1.50米),其他作物的缓冲区宽度增加至1米(2005年为0.25米和0.5米)并采用“最佳可行做法”,这些百分比可降至零。在农业区域内的自然区域,在“最佳可行做法”条件下,10%的影响水平可从此类区域的31%(1998年)降至0%。