• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏骤停幸存者管理中的抗心律失常药物治疗。

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the management of cardiac arrest survivors.

作者信息

Knilans T K, Prystowsky E N

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, Ind.

出版信息

Circulation. 1992 Jan;85(1 Suppl):I118-24.

PMID:1728494
Abstract

Antiarrhythmic drugs may be used as primary therapy to prevent recurrent cardiac arrest or as adjunctive treatment in patients given an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. In the latter instance, drugs are given to suppress nonlethal arrhythmias that are capable of initiating defibrillator discharge or to slow and/or decrease the number of episodes of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. When used as primary therapy, drug efficacy should be judged by nonempirical methods, preferably serial electrophysiological testing. Although no study has compared noninvasive with invasive testing to determine antiarrhythmic drug effectiveness in a substantial number of cardiac arrest survivors, several investigations have demonstrated that electrophysiological testing is useful for this purpose. One important limitation of serial electrophysiological testing is that nearly 40% of cardiac arrest survivors do not have a sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia initiated at baseline study; nonpharmacological treatment would appear preferable in these patients. Further, since a relatively high arrhythmic recurrence rate has been noted in individuals with suppressible sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation during drug therapy and a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30%, we recommend serial electrophysiological/pharmacological testing primarily for patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias with an ejection fraction greater than or equal to 30%.

摘要

抗心律失常药物可作为预防心脏骤停复发的主要治疗方法,或用于植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的辅助治疗。在后一种情况下,使用药物来抑制能够引发除颤器放电的非致命性心律失常,或减缓及/或减少持续性室性快速心律失常的发作次数。当用作主要治疗方法时,药物疗效应以非经验性方法判断,最好是进行系列电生理检查。尽管尚无研究比较非侵入性检查与侵入性检查来确定大量心脏骤停幸存者的抗心律失常药物疗效,但多项研究表明电生理检查对此目的有用。系列电生理检查的一个重要局限性是,近40%的心脏骤停幸存者在基线研究时未诱发持续性室性快速心律失常;这些患者采用非药物治疗似乎更可取。此外,由于在药物治疗期间,左心室射血分数低于30%且可抑制的持续性室性心动过速/心室颤动患者的心律失常复发率相对较高,我们建议主要对射血分数大于或等于30%且可诱发持续性室性快速心律失常的患者进行系列电生理/药物检查。

相似文献

1
Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the management of cardiac arrest survivors.心脏骤停幸存者管理中的抗心律失常药物治疗。
Circulation. 1992 Jan;85(1 Suppl):I118-24.
2
[Value of a serial electropharmacologic study in survivors of a cardiac arrest secondary to ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation].[对室性心动过速或心室颤动所致心脏骤停幸存者进行系列电药理学研究的价值]
G Ital Cardiol. 1984 Sep;14(9):644-54.
3
Response to programmed ventricular stimulation and clinical outcome in cardiac arrest survivors receiving randomised assignment to implantable cardioverter defibrillator or antiarrhythmic drug therapy.心脏骤停幸存者接受植入式心脏复律除颤器或抗心律失常药物治疗随机分组后对程序性心室刺激的反应及临床结局
Eur Heart J. 2004 Apr;25(8):642-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.01.009.
4
[Long-term outcome of pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment for ventricular arrhythmias].[室性心律失常的药物和非药物治疗的长期结果]
J Cardiol. 2000 Mar;35 Suppl 1:75-84.
5
Circadian variations of ventricular tachyarrhythmias detected by the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.植入式心脏复律除颤器检测到的室性快速心律失常的昼夜变化。
G Ital Cardiol. 1997 Feb;27(2):113-22.
6
[Treatment of malignant ventricular arrhythmia guided by electrophysiologic study].
Acta Med Port. 1998 Jan;11(1):9-16.
7
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with no overt heart disease: electrophysiologic observations and clinical outcome.无明显心脏病患者的院外心脏骤停:电生理观察与临床结局
Can J Cardiol. 1988 Mar;4(2):80-4.
8
Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials. AVID, CASH and CIDS studies. Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillator study. Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg . Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study.植入式心脏复律除颤器二级预防试验的荟萃分析。AVID、CASH和CIDS研究。抗心律失常药物与植入式除颤器研究。汉堡心脏骤停研究。加拿大植入式除颤器研究。
Eur Heart J. 2000 Dec;21(24):2071-8. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2476.
9
[Combination of celiprolol and amiodarone in the treatment of recurrent ventricular tachycardia].塞利洛尔与胺碘酮联合治疗复发性室性心动过速
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1996 Jan;45(1):18-23.
10
[Graded criteria to assess the effectiveness of anti-arrhythmia therapy in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmia by serial electrophysiological testing].[通过系列电生理检查评估抗心律失常治疗对室性快速性心律失常患者有效性的分级标准]
Z Kardiol. 1986 Feb;75(2):70-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Interactions of antiarrhythmic drugs and implantable devices in controlling ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2002 Sep;4(5):434-40. doi: 10.1007/s11886-002-0044-2.