Nakazawa Koichi, Yokoyama Kuninori, Yamakawa Naoko, Makita Koshi
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University School of Medicine, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
J Anesth. 2007;21(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s00540-006-0465-y. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
The present study investigated the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the inflammatory response in two different lung injury models: edematous lung induced by oleic acid (OA); and atelectatic lung induced by whole-lung lavage (LAV).
Japanese white rabbits (n = 28) were allocated to one of the two lung injury (OA or LAV) groups, and each group was treated with intermittent positive pressure ventilation, using zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) or PEEP (1 cm H(2)O above the lower inflection point [LIP]). Thus, the animals were divided into LAV-ZEEP, LAV-PEEP, OA-ZEEP, and OA-PEEP groups. Blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were sampled 3 h after ventilatory treatment to analyze interleukin (IL)-8 levels.
Pa(O) (2) was significantly decreased after the induction of lung injury, but was significantly higher in the PEEP groups compared to the ZEEP groups for each lung injury. Serum IL-8 levels were elevated in both experimental models. Serum IL-8 levels were significantly lower in LAV-PEEP than in LAV-ZEEP, whereas no difference was noted between OA-PEEP and OA-ZEEP. BALF IL-8 levels were lower in LAV-PEEP than in LAV-ZEEP. PEEP above LIP attenuated the elevation of IL-8 in BALF and serum in atelectatic lungs, but did not attenuate these increases in the edematous lungs.
These results suggest that the protective effects of PEEP on injured lungs may depend on the underlying lung pathology.
本研究调查了呼气末正压(PEEP)对两种不同肺损伤模型炎症反应的影响:油酸(OA)诱导的肺水肿肺;全肺灌洗(LAV)诱导的肺不张肺。
将28只日本白兔分配到两种肺损伤(OA或LAV)组之一,每组采用间歇正压通气,使用零呼气末正压(ZEEP)或PEEP(低于下拐点[LIP] 1 cm H₂O)进行治疗。因此,动物被分为LAV-ZEEP、LAV-PEEP、OA-ZEEP和OA-PEEP组。通气治疗3小时后采集血液和支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF),分析白细胞介素(IL)-8水平。
肺损伤诱导后Pa(O)₂显著降低,但对于每种肺损伤,PEEP组的Pa(O)₂显著高于ZEEP组。两种实验模型中血清IL-8水平均升高。LAV-PEEP组的血清IL-8水平显著低于LAV-ZEEP组,而OA-PEEP组和OA-ZEEP组之间未观察到差异。LAV-PEEP组的BALF IL-8水平低于LAV-ZEEP组。高于LIP的PEEP减轻了肺不张肺中BALF和血清中IL-8的升高,但未减轻水肿肺中这些升高。
这些结果表明,PEEP对损伤肺的保护作用可能取决于潜在的肺部病理情况。