Clement Yuri N, Morton-Gittens Jamie, Basdeo Luke, Blades Alexander, Francis Marie-Joanna, Gomes Natalie, Janjua Meer, Singh Adelle
Department of Para-Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007 Feb 7;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-7-4.
The increasing global popularity of herbal remedies requires further investigation to determine the probable factors driving this burgeoning phenomenon. We propose that the users' perception of efficacy is an important factor and assessed the perceived efficacy of herbal remedies by users accessing primary health facilities throughout Trinidad. Additionally, we determined how these users rated herbal remedies compared to conventional allopathic medicines as being less, equally or more efficacious.
A descriptive cross-sectional study was undertaken at 16 randomly selected primary healthcare facilities throughout Trinidad during June-August 2005. A de novo, pilot-tested questionnaire was interviewer-administered to confirmed herbal users (previous or current). Stepwise multiple regression analysis was done to determine the influence of predictor variables on perceived efficacy and comparative efficacy with conventional medicines.
265 herbal users entered the study and cited over 100 herbs for the promotion of health/wellness and the management of specific health concerns. Garlic was the most popular herb (in 48.3% of the sample) and was used for the common cold, cough, fever, as 'blood cleansers' and carminatives. It was also used in 20% of hypertension patients. 230 users (86.8%) indicated that herbs were efficacious and perceived that they had equal or greater efficacy than conventional allopathic medicines. Gender, ethnicity, income and years of formal education did not influence patients' perception of herb efficacy; however, age did (p = 0.036). Concomitant use of herbs and allopathic medicines was relatively high at 30%; and most users did not inform their attending physician.
Most users perceived that herbs were efficacious, and in some instances, more efficacious than conventional medicines. We suggest that this perception may be a major contributing factor influencing the sustained and increasing popularity of herbs. Evidence-based research in the form of randomized controlled clinical trials should direct the proper use of herbs to validate (or otherwise) efficacy and determine safety. In the Caribbean, most indigenous herbs are not well investigated and this points to the urgent need for biomedical investigations to assess the safety profile and efficacy of our popular medicinal herbs.
草药疗法在全球日益流行,这需要进一步研究以确定推动这一蓬勃发展现象的可能因素。我们认为使用者对疗效的认知是一个重要因素,并评估了特立尼达各地初级卫生保健机构的使用者对草药疗法的感知疗效。此外,我们还确定了这些使用者如何将草药疗法与传统的对抗疗法药物进行比较,认为其疗效较低、相同或更高。
2005年6月至8月期间,在特立尼达随机选择的16个初级卫生保健机构进行了一项描述性横断面研究。由访谈员对确诊的草药使用者(以前或现在的)进行了一项全新的、经过预试验的问卷调查。进行逐步多元回归分析,以确定预测变量对感知疗效以及与传统药物相比的疗效的影响。
265名草药使用者参与了研究,并列举了100多种用于促进健康/保健以及管理特定健康问题的草药。大蒜是最受欢迎的草药(占样本的48.3%),用于治疗普通感冒、咳嗽、发烧,作为“血液清洁剂”和驱风剂。它也被20%的高血压患者使用。230名使用者(86.8%)表示草药有效,并认为它们与传统的对抗疗法药物具有相同或更高的疗效。性别、种族、收入和正规教育年限并未影响患者对草药疗效的认知;然而,年龄有影响(p = 0.036)。草药与对抗疗法药物同时使用的比例相对较高,为30%;并且大多数使用者未告知他们的主治医生。
大多数使用者认为草药有效,在某些情况下,比传统药物更有效。我们认为这种认知可能是影响草药持续且日益流行的一个主要因素。以随机对照临床试验形式开展的循证研究应指导草药的正确使用,以验证(或否定)其疗效并确定安全性。在加勒比地区,大多数本土草药尚未得到充分研究,这表明迫切需要进行生物医学研究,以评估我们常用草药的安全性和疗效。