Savin C, Huck S, Rolland C, Benderdouche M, Faure O, Noacco G, Menotti J, Candolfi E, Pelloux H, Grillot R, Coupe S, Derouin F
Bio Advance, Espace Villa Parc, l'érable, 1 avenue Marne et Gondoire, 77600 Bussy-Saint-Martin, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Apr;45(4):1205-10. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01418-06. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
We prospectively evaluated a new PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Onychodiag; BioAdvance, France) for the diagnosis of dermatophytic onychomycosis by testing nail samples from 438 patients with suspected onychomycosis and from 108 healthy controls in three independent laboratories. In two laboratories, samples were collected by trained mycologists as close as possible to the lesions (proximal samples). In one laboratory, samples were collected by other physicians. All samples were processed by conventional mycological techniques and by Onychodiag, blindly to the mycological results. An additional distal sample, collected by clipping the nail plate, was obtained from 75 patients and tested with Onychodiag alone. In patients with culture-proven dermatophytic onychomycosis, the sensitivity of Onychodiag was 83.6% (87.9% including the gray zone) and ranged from 75 to 100% according to the laboratory and the sampling conditions. The specificity was 100% when healthy subjects were considered true negative controls. Onychodiag was positive on 68 patient samples that were sterile or yielded nondermatophyte species in culture. Based on the results of Onychodiag for mycologically proven positive samples and true-negative samples, these results were considered true positives, and the poor performance of mycology on these samples was attributed to inconvenient sampling conditions or to contaminants. When tested on distal samples, Onychodiag was positive in 49/53 (92%) cases of proven dermatophytic onychomycosis. Finally, with either proximal or distal samples, Onychodiag provided a diagnosis of dermatophytic onychomycosis within 24 to 48 h after sampling, and its sensitivity was close to that of mycological techniques applied to proximal samples.
我们通过在三个独立实验室检测438例疑似甲真菌病患者和108例健康对照的指甲样本,对一种新型聚合酶链反应-酶联免疫吸附测定试剂盒(Onychodiag;法国BioAdvance公司)进行了前瞻性评估,以诊断皮肤癣菌性甲真菌病。在两个实验室,样本由训练有素的真菌学家尽可能靠近病损处采集(近端样本)。在一个实验室,样本由其他医生采集。所有样本均采用传统真菌学技术和Onychodiag试剂盒进行处理,处理过程对真菌学检测结果保密。另外从75例患者中通过修剪甲板采集了远端样本,仅用Onychodiag试剂盒进行检测。在培养证实为皮肤癣菌性甲真菌病的患者中,Onychodiag试剂盒的敏感性为83.6%(包括灰色区域时为87.9%),根据实验室和采样条件,敏感性范围为75%至100%。当将健康受试者视为真阴性对照时,特异性为100%。68份培养结果为无菌或培养出非皮肤癣菌菌种的患者样本,Onychodiag试剂盒检测呈阳性。根据Onychodiag试剂盒对真菌学证实为阳性样本和真阴性样本的检测结果,这些结果被视为真阳性,而真菌学检测在这些样本上表现不佳归因于采样条件不便或存在污染物。在远端样本上进行检测时,Onychodiag试剂盒在53例经证实的皮肤癣菌性甲真菌病病例中有49例(92%)呈阳性。最后,无论是近端样本还是远端样本,Onychodiag试剂盒在采样后24至48小时内即可诊断皮肤癣菌性甲真菌病,其敏感性与应用于近端样本的真菌学技术相近。