Suppr超能文献

相关性的重要性:为家庭医学研究共享电子健康数据的意愿。

The Importance of Relevance: Willingness to Share eHealth Data for Family Medicine Research.

作者信息

Bartlett Gillian, Macgibbon Brenda, Rubinowicz Analia, Nease Cecilia, Dawes Martin, Tamblyn Robyn

机构信息

Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Mathematics, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2018 Sep 4;6:255. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00255. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

To determine the proportion of family medicine patients unwilling to allow their eHealth data to be used for research purposes, and evaluate how patient characteristics and the relevance of research impact that decision. Cross-sectional questionnaire. Acute care respiratory clinic or an outpatient family medicine clinic in Montreal, Quebec. Four hundred seventy-four waiting room patients recruited via convenience sampling. A self-administered questionnaire collected data on age, gender, employment status, education, mother tongue and perceived health status. The main outcome of was self-reported relevance of three research scenarios and willingness or refusal to share their anonymized data. Responses were compared for family practice vs. specialty care patients. The questionnaire was completed by 229 family medicine respondents and 245 outpatient respondents. Almost a quarter of all respondents felt the research was not relevant. Family medicine patients (15.7%) were unwilling to allow their data to be used for scenario vs. 9.4% in the outpatient clinic. Lack of relevance (OR 11.55; 95% CI 5.12-26.09) and being in family practice (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.06-4.27) increased the likelihood of refusal to share data for research. Family medicine patients were somewhat less willing to share eHealth data, but the overall refusal rate indicates a need to better engage patients in understanding the significance of full access to eHealth data for the purposes of research. Personal relevance of the research had a strong impact on the responses arguing for better efforts to make research more pertinent to patients.

摘要

确定不愿让其电子健康数据用于研究目的的家庭医学患者比例,并评估患者特征和研究相关性如何影响这一决定。横断面问卷调查。魁北克省蒙特利尔的急性护理呼吸诊所或门诊家庭医学诊所。通过便利抽样招募了474名候诊室患者。一份自填式问卷收集了有关年龄、性别、就业状况、教育程度、母语和自我感知健康状况的数据。主要结果是自我报告的三种研究场景的相关性以及是否愿意或拒绝分享其匿名数据。对家庭医学患者和专科护理患者的回答进行了比较。229名家庭医学受访者和245名门诊受访者完成了问卷。几乎四分之一的受访者认为该研究不相关。家庭医学患者(15.7%)不愿让其数据用于该场景,而门诊患者为9.4%。缺乏相关性(比值比11.55;95%置信区间5.12 - 26.09)和处于家庭医学环境(比值比2.13;95%置信区间1.06 - 4.27)增加了拒绝为研究分享数据的可能性。家庭医学患者在分享电子健康数据方面的意愿略低,但总体拒绝率表明需要更好地让患者理解为研究目的充分获取电子健康数据的重要性。研究的个人相关性对回答有很大影响,这表明需要做出更大努力使研究与患者更相关。

相似文献

1
The Importance of Relevance: Willingness to Share eHealth Data for Family Medicine Research.
Front Public Health. 2018 Sep 4;6:255. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00255. eCollection 2018.
2
Adolescents' willingness to use a school-based clinic in view of expressed health concerns.
J Adolesc Health Care. 1988 May;9(3):208-13. doi: 10.1016/0197-0070(88)90073-3.
4
Patients' knowledge of options at the end of life: ignorance in the face of death.
JAMA. 2000 Nov 15;284(19):2483-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.19.2483.
6
The negative self-perceived health of migrants with precarious status in Montreal, Canada: A cross-sectional study.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0231327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231327. eCollection 2020.
8
Technology Experience of Solid Organ Transplant Patients and Their Overall Willingness to Use Interactive Health Technology.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 Mar;50(2):151-162. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12362. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
10
Contemporary Views of Research Participant Willingness to Participate and Share Digital Data in Biomedical Research.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915717. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15717.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Health is primary: Family medicine for America's health.
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Oct;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-S12. doi: 10.1370/afm.1699.
2
Development of a competency framework for quality improvement in family medicine: a qualitative study.
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012 Summer;32(3):174-80. doi: 10.1002/chp.21142.
3
Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care.
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 May 2;13(6):395-405. doi: 10.1038/nrg3208.
4
Secondary uses of electronic health record data: benefits and barriers.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Jan;38(1):34-40, 1. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38005-7.
6
Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.
J Med Ethics. 2008 Apr;34(4):308-14. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.020032.
7
Consent mechanisms for electronic health record systems: a simple yet unresolved issue.
J Med Syst. 2007 Apr;31(2):91-6. doi: 10.1007/s10916-006-9030-3.
8
Record linkage research and informed consent: who consents?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb 12;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-18.
9
Toward a national framework for the secondary use of health data: an American Medical Informatics Association White Paper.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):1-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2273. Epub 2006 Oct 31.
10
Contribution of primary care to health systems and health.
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验