Scott Vicky, Votova Kristine, Scanlan Andria, Close Jacqueline
British Columbia Injury Research & Prevention Unit and Ministry of Health, Office for Injury Prevention, 1515 Blanshard, Victoria, BC, V8W 3C8, Canada.
Age Ageing. 2007 Mar;36(2):130-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl165. Epub 2007 Feb 10.
to conduct a systematic review of published studies that test the validity and reliability of fall-risk assessment tools for use among older adults in community, home-support, long-term and acute care settings.
searches were conducted in EbscoHost and MEDLINE for published studies in the English language between January 1980 and July 2004, where the primary or secondary purpose was to test the predictive value of one or more fall assessment tools on a population primarily 65 years and older. The tool must have had as its primary outcome falls, fall-related injury or gait/balance. Only studies that used prospective validation were considered.
thirty-four articles testing 38 different tools met the inclusion criteria. The community setting represents the largest number of studies (14) and tools (23) tested, followed by acute (12 studies and 8 tools), long-term care (LTC) (6 studies and 10 tools) and home-support (4 studies and 4 tools). Eleven of the 38 tools are multifactorial assessment tools (MAT) that cover a wide range of fall-risk factors, and 27 are functional mobility assessment tools (FMA) that involve measures of physical activity related to gait, strength or balance.
fall-risk assessment tools exist that show moderate to good validity and reliability in most health service delivery areas. However, few tools were tested more than once or in more than one setting. Therefore, no single tool can be recommended for implementation in all settings or for all subpopulations within each setting.
对已发表的研究进行系统综述,这些研究测试了用于社区、家庭护理、长期护理和急性护理环境中老年人的跌倒风险评估工具的有效性和可靠性。
在EbscoHost和MEDLINE中进行检索,查找1980年1月至2004年7月间发表的英文研究,其主要或次要目的是测试一种或多种跌倒评估工具对主要为65岁及以上人群的预测价值。该工具必须以跌倒、跌倒相关损伤或步态/平衡作为主要结果。仅考虑使用前瞻性验证的研究。
34篇测试38种不同工具的文章符合纳入标准。社区环境中测试的研究(14项)和工具(23种)数量最多,其次是急性护理(12项研究和8种工具)、长期护理(6项研究和10种工具)和家庭护理(4项研究和4种工具)。38种工具中有11种是多因素评估工具(MAT),涵盖广泛的跌倒风险因素,27种是功能移动性评估工具(FMA),涉及与步态、力量或平衡相关的身体活动测量。
存在一些跌倒风险评估工具,在大多数卫生服务提供领域显示出中等至良好的有效性和可靠性。然而,很少有工具在不止一个环境中或被多次测试。因此,无法推荐单一工具在所有环境中实施或用于每个环境中的所有亚人群。